1) Consider the source
2) They invoked nuclear bombs (fud) in the article. (Indication of lack of
objectivity).
3) They do not tell you that tritiated water leaves your body just like beer
does. (Fear mongering)
So, yeah, probably the equivalent of a a few chest X rays.
But that was tritiated water. You would really have to work hard to turn
your gun site tritium into tritiated water.
-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Reynolds
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 10:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla Model 3... who else is getting one?
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/nuclear-reaction/tritium-poisoning-at-indias-kaiga-nuclear-rea/blog/11450/
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:21 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote:
Tritium illuminates reticles on some of my scopes, too. I assume that's
what
you're talking about anyway. It's sealed inside of an aluminum tube, how
bad
could it be? Meh.
On 4/1/2016 10:20 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
I can't count the amount of tritium in my house on two hands.
And we always have lots of bananas! ;)
I used to be stuck in a situation where I was forced to breath molten
"depleted" uranium smoke though :/
On Apr 1, 2016 10:13 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote:
I do have chunk of uranium in a drawer in my kitchen. People do not have
a realistic sense of the relative risk.
From: Chuck McCown
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 9:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla Model 3... who else is getting one?
What exactly do you imagine a radiation “leak” is.
We are talking uranium dioxide. A ceramic pellet. Does not burn, melt,
dissolve, evaporate...
From: Stefan Englhardt
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 7:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla Model 3... who else is getting one?
Reprocessing does not solve the problem. This waste does not vanish for
an
insane amount of time. No covering material lasts long enough. You have
to
reencapsule it to keep radiation inside. You need a place to store it and
watch nothing leaks. Our power companies try to split the responsibility
to
a separate company. They know this company will die sometimes in the
future.
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: Chuck McCown <[email protected]>
Datum: 02.04.2016 03:04 (GMT+01:00)
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla Model 3... who else is getting one?
And why are you thinking the waste needs to be encapsulated?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hormesis
Just reprocess it. And really it is not that dangerous. A tanker of
chlorine or ammonia is much more dangerous.
From: Stefan Englhardt
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 6:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla Model 3... who else is getting one?
Nuclear is very expensive. If you calculate the cost of moving and
reencapsulating the waste for some thousand years. Your ancestors will
learn
that no energy company will exist long enough to take responsibility for
the
waste they generated. This will be done by the tax payer.
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
Datum: 01.04.2016 22:18 (GMT+01:00)
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla Model 3... who else is getting one?
