What exactly do you imagine a radiation “leak” is. We are talking uranium dioxide. A ceramic pellet. Does not burn, melt, dissolve, evaporate...
From: Stefan Englhardt Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 7:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla Model 3... who else is getting one? Reprocessing does not solve the problem. This waste does not vanish for an insane amount of time. No covering material lasts long enough. You have to reencapsule it to keep radiation inside. You need a place to store it and watch nothing leaks. Our power companies try to split the responsibility to a separate company. They know this company will die sometimes in the future. -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: Chuck McCown <[email protected]> Datum: 02.04.2016 03:04 (GMT+01:00) An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla Model 3... who else is getting one? And why are you thinking the waste needs to be encapsulated? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hormesis Just reprocess it. And really it is not that dangerous. A tanker of chlorine or ammonia is much more dangerous. From: Stefan Englhardt Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 6:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla Model 3... who else is getting one? Nuclear is very expensive. If you calculate the cost of moving and reencapsulating the waste for some thousand years. Your ancestors will learn that no energy company will exist long enough to take responsibility for the waste they generated. This will be done by the tax payer. -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: Josh Luthman <[email protected]> Datum: 01.04.2016 22:18 (GMT+01:00) An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Tesla Model 3... who else is getting one?
