Needs a splice tray to serve as its own NID. So Edgepoint is out.
Plus that's more expensive than our entire NID/ONT setup as well, and we have SWOS. Would rather have RouterOS. It would be nice to have the RB260GS upgraded to RouterOS with switchchip, embedded in a temperature rated outdoor enclosure with a integrated splice tray system. For about $100. I think that is definitely doable considering the RB260GS is less than $40 shipped. -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 12:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] MikroTik FTC You just described the Ubiquiti EdgePoint models, minus the RouterOS part. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, that is what I would like, an outdoor PoE solution with splice > tray built in and two or more port version. > > > > And another one with SFP+ and 4-12 port version, again PoE and outdoor. > > Or better yet with all ports PoE that could be powered from any port. > > > > With DOM and full routerOS. > > > > > > > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie > Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 11:41 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] MikroTik FTC > > > > It would be nice if they had at least made it like a 2 port RB260GS in > an outdoor case, although as far as I can tell, those don't have DOM > capabilities either. > > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: > > I really wasn't trying to be condescending, it would actually be a > useful thing to have a media converter that understood optic DOM and > could be monitored... Even if it only had a maximum of three or four > OIDs to poll, for link status, Rx power, link speed on the copper port. > > But by the time one adds that functionality you have a $65 device vs. > a $35 media converter and it's basically the same cost as a cheap > mikrotik router with an SFP port. > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:43 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > > Fuck, I don't know. First time I heard about it. Didn't know if it was > MikroTik's attempt at a "media converter" that's basically a two-port > switch. That's why I asked. God damn, I asked a question and got an > answer, but thank you for the condescending commentary. > > On 4/5/2016 11:28 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > > It's a media converter, over what IP data connection is it supposed to > speak SNMP or report DOM data from the optic? > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:04 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was hoping it was managed so that we can monitor Rx power levels. Oh well. > > > > On 4/5/2016 10:54 PM, Stefan Englhardt wrote: > > Cheap and works. > > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- > Von: George Skorup <[email protected]> > Datum: 06.04.2016 03:52 (GMT+01:00) > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] MikroTik FTC > > > > > > > > > >
