and the linked article is dated 4/4/2016...
so something has changed.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 4/8/2016 5:39 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
I never heard about it, and it was in our local rag yesterday. So it
is at least news to me.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 4/8/2016 5:35 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I thought this was common knowledge six months ago?
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com>
*To: *"Motorola III" <af@afmug.com>
*Sent: *Friday, April 8, 2016 7:34:30 AM
*Subject: *[AFMUG] FCC wants "nutrition labels" for broadband
This is, sadly, on topic.
The FCC has proposed something akin to "nutrition labels" for
broadband that will "clearly" show such things as speed, caps, and
hidden fees. This is an ars technica article about the proposal:
http://arstechnica.com/business/2016/04/fccs-nutrition-labels-for-broadband-show-speed-caps-and-hidden-fees/
--
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
