Oh so now I am a commoner...Lol and so customer will hold us to a label versus physics of path reality? On Apr 8, 2016 6:35 AM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
> I thought this was common knowledge six months ago? > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> > *To: *"Motorola III" <af@afmug.com> > *Sent: *Friday, April 8, 2016 7:34:30 AM > *Subject: *[AFMUG] FCC wants "nutrition labels" for broadband > > > This is, sadly, on topic. > > The FCC has proposed something akin to "nutrition labels" for broadband > that will "clearly" show such things as speed, caps, and hidden fees. This > is an ars technica article about the proposal: > > > <http://arstechnica.com/business/2016/04/fccs-nutrition-labels-for-broadband-show-speed-caps-and-hidden-fees/> > http://arstechnica.com/business/2016/04/fccs-nutrition-labels-for-broadband-show-speed-caps-and-hidden-fees/ > > > -- > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > >
