I think he already has that taken care of. He had a case at WISPAmerica.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > Any more progress with the 1u sync injector? Have you thought of 3d > printing a 1u enclosure for it? Not sure how much it costs to create > a mold from a 3d print for mass production. Would think it would be > faster then metal. > > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't have a firm date yet. I am in the process of nailing down lead > > times on the enclosures and validating some final design choices. > > > > I would guess 90ish days. I'll be able to firm this up a bit over the > next > > couple of weeks. > > > > On Mar 28, 2016 2:15 PM, "Matt" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> What is time frame on 1u configurable sync injector? > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > There's already one of these on the roadmap. Unit which will sync two > >> > radios. > >> > > >> > On Mar 27, 2016 11:37 AM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Woulda been nice. Oh well. > >> >> > >> >> This I think is another good example for a UGPS-like SyncPipe. Could > I > >> >> send a climber up to take the Parasitic pipe out and then throw on a > >> >> SyncInjector at the bottom... sure. Burning a GigE SyncInjector for > a 1 > >> >> AP > >> >> site though. > >> >> > >> >> On 3/26/2016 6:42 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I wouldn't recommend this. Mainly because it's going to unbalance > the > >> >> gigabit ethernet pairs and likely cause ethernet errors as the power > >> >> consumption changes. > >> >> > >> >> On Mar 26, 2016 7:15 AM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Dumb question, probably best answered by Forrest. Say I have one of > >> >>> the > >> >>> newer universal Parasitic SyncPipes. Newer meaning Rev G+. Universal > >> >>> meaning > >> >>> you can use them on standard Canopy 30VDC POE and the stupid 320/430 > >> >>> pinout, > >> >>> since they tap only the two power pins that don't change. OK, so now > >> >>> say I > >> >>> take a GigE injector and configure a 450 AP to negotiate 1000BaseT. > >> >>> Will > >> >>> GigE work... "through" the Parasitic pipe? I know the 10/100 data > >> >>> pairs are > >> >>> passed straight through. Not sure about the other two pairs. Since > it > >> >>> taps > >> >>> only two pins for power, I doubt there's any bonding going on. > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >
