well, you only need to put 1 AC outlet wherever the 48-port PoE switch is,
vs running 120VAC everywhere around a ceiling. So that's a 48:1 ratio at
least.



On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Since you still need AC outlets I can't imagine the savings would be all
> that significant. The industry seems to be headed to figuring out how to
> get the enormous installed base to LED. Since electricians are the Obrien
> pulling the CAT5 now I can't see how you get the cost down.
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016, 7:53 PM Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> http://www2.cree.com/smartcast-landing-page
>>
>> Would you build it?
>>
>> Seems to make sense, considering the low cost of midspan PoE injectors
>> these days. Or even old 802.3af 100Mbps switches you can get used (Cisco
>> 3560, 3750).
>>
>> One of the neat things about doing PoE lighting is that you could control
>> all the lights in a building via a shell script and SSH session into a PoE
>> switch, turning on and off ports based on cron jobs, schedules, as a result
>> of a script server receiving some event, etc. This could be done with a $50
>> box running Linux.
>>
>> No need to run any vendor proprietary software of any sort.
>>
>> One of the things I realized when thinking about this is that it could
>> dramatically lower labor costs to install lighting in a large building.
>> You'd be looking at the hourly labor rate for low-cost "low voltage" alarm
>> cabling/cat5e pulling install technicians and not licensed electricians
>> (apprentice or journeyman). Electricians would of course need to do the
>> rest of a building's 120/240VAC, but not the lighting.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to