Same for Thermal conductivity…
Sincerely, Joshaven Potter Google Hangouts: [email protected] Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370 [email protected] > On May 18, 2016, at 4:34 PM, Joshaven Mailing Lists <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Silver is more conductive then Gold however gold is often better a conductor > choice for situations where corrosion is a concern. > <PastedGraphic-1.tiff> > > > Sincerely, > Joshaven Potter > Google Hangouts: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370 > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > >> On May 18, 2016, at 1:02 PM, Robert Andrews <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Electrical Conductivity or Thermal Conductivity... I think Gold is higher >> than Silver for Thermal... And Titanium is higher than both... >> >> On 05/17/2016 02:57 PM, Sean Heskett wrote: >>> good point chuck, i should have researched that before commenting. i >>> guess it's used in electronics because it doesn't oxidize like the other >>> metals?? >>> >>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: >>> >>> Silver has it beat for conductivity. >>> Carbon (graphene form only) >>> Silver >>> Copper >>> Gold >>> Aluminum >>> Calcium >>> Tungsten >>> Zinc >>> Nickel >>> Lithium >>> Iron >>> etc >>> *From:* Sean Heskett <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 17, 2016 3:37 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] GPRO stock >>> Exactly my point Cameron ;-) >>> >>> Before Nixon >>> 1oz gold == $35US or inversely $1 == 1/35oz gold...seems pretty >>> standard to me. >>> Also your own quote states "The government held the $35 per ounce >>> price until August 15, 1971, when President Richard Nixon announced >>> that the United States would no longer convert dollars to gold at a >>> fixed value, *thus completely abandoning the gold standard*." >>> >>> After Nixon >>> Gold and the dollar float. Gold is now traded as a commodity as it >>> should. Otherwise the world economy is tied to a very finite amount >>> (183,600 tonnes) of a shiny rock whose real value is it's chemical >>> element properties. It is the best (naturally occurring) conductor >>> of electricity and the best reflector of infrared heat (amongst many >>> other properties). >>> 1/256,280oz gold (2 cents at todays prices ;) >>> -Sean >>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Cameron Crum <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: >>> >>> Not sure what history books you are reading, but On June 5, >>> 1933, the United States went off the gold standard, a monetary >>> system in which currency is backed by gold, when Congress >>> enacted a joint resolution nullifying the right of creditors to >>> demand payment in gold. The United States had been on a gold >>> standard since 1879, except for an embargo on gold exports >>> during World War I, but bank failures during the Great >>> Depression of the 1930s frightened the public into hoarding >>> gold, making the policy untenable. >>> >>> The government held the $35 per ounce price until August 15, >>> 1971, when President Richard Nixon announced that the United >>> States would no longer convert dollars to gold at a fixed value, >>> thus completely abandoning the gold standard. In 1974, President >>> Gerald Ford signed legislation that permitted Americans again to >>> own gold bullion. >>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: >>> >>> Actually Nixon got us off the gold standard. And it's a >>> good thing because with an $18trillion GDP for just the US >>> alone there is no way our current economy would operate >>> being tied to a shiny rock. That phone in your pocket would >>> cost $1million or more just from the gold inside of it :-/ >>> Leave the shiny rocks to the hippies at EDM festivals lol. >>> -Sean >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, May 17, 2016, Josh Luthman >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> <mailto:[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: >>> >>> You think that's bad? The USD isn't backed by gold but >>> rather a fictitious system controlled by private banks. >>> Thanks, FDR. >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>> >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>> >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Lewis Bergman >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> That is soooo sad >>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:31 PM Josh Luthman >>> <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Who care about P&L? It's stocks. >>> AAPL is one of the biggest companies out there. >>> There is no real correlation between stocks and >>> how the company operates. >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340 >>> <tel:937-552-2340>> >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343 >>> <tel:937-552-2343>> >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Lewis Bergman >>> <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Yep. Which is why they both make me nervous. >>> You can't ever guess where those types will >>> go by looking at balance sheets and P&L. >>> Although to tell the truth, it had been >>> pretty difficult to do that with any stock >>> for a long time. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 17, 2016, 1:57 PM Josh Luthman >>> <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> ...you mean like AAPL? >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340 >>> <tel:937-552-2340>> >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343 >>> <tel:937-552-2343>> >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Lewis >>> Bergman <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Not that it matters, as I think GPRO >>> is mostly a marketing play at this >>> point, I saw some film of some >>> competitors product with a really >>> nifty 360 camera for about half of a >>> Hero3. >>> >>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:38 PM >>> Chris Wright <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I sure hope it goes back to $15. >>> I bought at $12 last on its >>> uptick and then it plummeted. L____ >>> >>> ____ >>> >>> Chris Wright____ >>> >>> Network Administrator____ >>> >>> Velociter Wireless____ >>> >>> 209-838-1221 x115 >>> <tel:209-838-1221%20x115 >>> <tel:209-838-1221%20x115>>____ >>> >>> ____ >>> >>> *From:*Af >>> [mailto:[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>] >>> *On Behalf Of *CBB - Jay Fuller >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 17, 2016 >>> 8:22 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] GPRO >>> stock____ >>> >>> ____ >>> >>> ____ >>> >>> oh, i know i don't matter...____ >>> >>> ____ >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> ____ >>> >>> *From:*Robert ____ >>> >>> *To:*[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> ____ >>> >>> *Sent:*Tuesday, May 17, 2016 >>> 9:49 AM____ >>> >>> *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] GPRO >>> stock____ >>> >>> ____ >>> >>> Just after Icann sold a >>> billion... just to make >>> sure you know you don't >>> matter...____ >>> >>> ____ >>> >>> On 5/17/16 7:45 AM, CBB - >>> Jay Fuller wrote:____ >>> >>> I heard burkshire just >>> bought a billion worth >>> of apple yesterday....____ >>> >>> ____ >>> >>> ____ >>> >>> ----- Original >>> Message ----- ____ >>> >>> *From:*Travis >>> Johnson ____ >>> >>> *To:*[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> ____ >>> >>> *Sent:*Tuesday, May >>> 17, 2016 9:23 AM____ >>> >>> *Subject:*[AFMUG] >>> GPRO stock____ >>> >>> ____ >>> >>> Hey... if anyone is >>> looking for a 4-5 >>> month stock with the >>> possibility >>> of a 50% return, you >>> should take a look >>> at GPRO. It's a >>> great buy right >>> now and I personally >>> think it will hit >>> $14-$15 again within >>> the next six >>> months. :) >>> >>> Travis____ >>> >>> ____ >>> >>> >
