How are they using CAF? From: David Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 7:32 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] It had to end sometime
Yeah, I faintly remember that discussion. Not all its cut out to be. It just gives more fodder to the FCC for better coverage to ATT so that they can buy some time to block other incumbents for a chance at some subsidy moneys. They are using the CAF to do this with. On 05/17/2016 03:10 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote: Verizon has, or had, an LTE fixed solution a few years ago. I am pretty sure it was depply discussed on this list. It was UBB at around 10G for $100 if memory serves. ATT will likely try to be in the same ballpark. On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:54 PM David <[email protected]> wrote: Thanks guys, now I know my conscience wasnt lying to me :) On 05/17/2016 02:50 PM, George Skorup wrote: "unlimited" to a big ISP/cellco means throttling after some finite cap. They are greedy shitbags. On 5/17/2016 2:32 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: Since it will likely be licensed, it is unlikely to be unlimited IMO. On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]> wrote: Very curious to see what their pricing is going to be on fixed and weather or not its UBB or unlimited. On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Jason McKemie <[email protected]> wrote: Verizon did the same thing around here several years ago with similar results. On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> wrote: They tried wireless in Dallas called Project Angel long time ago. Didn't work out .... On May 17, 2016 1:17 PM, "Seth Mattinen" <[email protected]> wrote: On 5/17/16 12:13, David wrote: Looks like ATT now wants to be a WISP,CELLCO,TELCO,ISP,and a Satellite provider all rolled up into one. http://www.arkansasbusiness.com/article/111143/att-plans-launch-of-new-product-touts-115-billion-investment-since-2012?utm_source=enews_051716&utm_medium=email&utm_content=technology-news&utm_campaign=newsletter&enews_zone=3897 Jack of all trades, master of none. ~Seth
