Another thing that gets me is how the GOP is actually "supporting" him, or at least trying to create the public appearance of it. Like, are you kidding me? You guys hated this guy's guts. You said all kinds of bad crap about him as both a person and as a presidential candidate, and now you "support" him? Really?
I mean, you all claim to have these "core beliefs" that you said Trump doesn't support or embody - things that you otherwise fight for tooth and nail. Now that Trump is the candidate though, you guys just threw that all away to rally behind him. What a bunch of fucking lackies. The party system has to go, or we're all just doomed. On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wow...now I have to work on getting that image out of my head...thanks Josh. > Besides that, not saying it is a valid point, just what I hear people > saying.I haven't heard anyone say they like Trump, approve of what he has > been saying, and still voted for him. They just are more sickened by > everyone else I think. I don't know. It is surely a wacky thing to watch. > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:06 PM Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >> >> This is the fascinating thing to me, is that somehow Trump isn't >> "status quo". Of course he is, he's used to be political. He's used to >> operating in and with the political spectrum, local and federal >> governments, etc. He's just not been a "politician" so he's been >> allowed to "get away with more" at a certain level. >> >> I really, truly don't believe that his presidential run is anything >> more than him masturbating his ego. He's always been pretty darn good >> at branding, this is kind of an extension of that IMO. >> >> *shrug* Just my $0.02 USD. >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > I think you are wrong about Trump likely voters. Everyone that I have >> > talked >> > to, admittedly an extremely unscientifically small sample size with zero >> > diversity, seem to be voting against all incumbent types instead of for >> > Trump. It seems they are all kind of sick of the status quot and would >> > elect >> > an armadillo or a 5 year old if they had never held office. So, if you >> > have >> > never held office and want to run now is the time. 4 or 6 years from now >> > everyone will likely figure out that like it or not, experience does >> > count >> > for something. >> > >> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:57 PM Jaime Solorza >> > <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Naw this lady is not young and doesn't represent much of Texas...but I >> >> see >> >> no distinction between her and Trump on unfounded beliefs with lemmings >> >> as >> >> followers... lots of gullible people out there...if they could come up >> >> with >> >> a unique thought their heads would explode.... >> >> >> >> On May 24, 2016 3:24 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> I would have to take exception to the whole "the younger generation is >> >>> stupid" . Yes, there are a ton of stupid people out there but I don't >> >>> see >> >>> evidence that the younger generations is any less intelligent than any >> >>> other. Less experienced of course, just not dumber. >> >>> I realize the anecdotal nature but for example, My nephew got a >> >>> scholarship to go to Georgia Tech for Aerospace engineering. In >> >>> general, I >> >>> think they are as smart as we ever were. >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:36 PM Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> >> >>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> I think we are going backwards in terms of education and motivation, >> >>>> especially in science, in the U.S. If it wasn't for the H1-B >> >>>> program, we >> >>>> would be a nation of morons. This generation for the most part is a >> >>>> complete waste of human intelligence. >> >>>> >> >>>> Rory >> >>>> >> >>>> -----Original Message----- >> >>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds >> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 1:33 PM >> >>>> To: af@afmug.com >> >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Texas board of education vote is critical for >> >>>> conservatives – and US schools >> >>>> >> >>>> I think I've gotten to the point where I believe that the lack of >> >>>> "survival of the fittest" (and sometimes simply the luckiest) is >> >>>> having a >> >>>> net-negative effect on our species. Except for a very narrow segment >> >>>> of the >> >>>> population, we are de-evolving. >> >>>> >> >>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> > <Coke zero snorts out his nose....> >> >>>> > >> >>>> > -----Original Message----- From: Robert Andrews >> >>>> > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 11:46 AM >> >>>> > To: af@afmug.com >> >>>> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Texas board of education vote is critical >> >>>> > for >> >>>> > conservatives – and US schools >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > See Chemtrails... >> >>>> > >> >>>> > On 05/24/2016 10:17 AM, Bill Prince wrote: >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> Wow. Is there some sort of aerially-disbursed drug going around >> >>>> >> Texas? >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> bp >> >>>> >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> On 5/24/2016 10:09 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote: >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> What a fucking moron...heaven help us!!! >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> Texas board of education vote is critical for conservatives – and >> >>>> >>> US >> >>>> >>> schools >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/24/texas-board-of-educat >> >>>> >>> ion-election-conservatives-public-schools-curriculum >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >
