This is our most loaded 5Ghz ePMP AP: [image: Inline image 1]
[image: Inline image 2] Users on this AP have plans from 1.5-10Mbps. I think it averages 70-80% of downlink frame usage during peak times, but I don't have a graph available because Cambium won't expose this as a percentage via SNMP (you have to look at the real-time value in the web UI). On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:41 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > we are moving to epmp for cheap in 5ghz, the most populated ap only has > like 12 users on 12/2 plans up to 8 miles, I dont see it scaling well > compared to 450, but much better than the ubnt could ever dream. Its sync > lets us do ABAB with no notable hit yet. > 3ghz we are moving to 450 from a mix of ubnt shit and 320 garbage (though > the 320 has been a beast) because the 1x gets us the edge of nlos > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> PMP450 is better. It will win the interference war. It will offer a bit >> better bits/hz. If the revenue supports it, use it. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and >>> some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far >>> have not deployed more then couple test links. >>> >>> For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences >>> you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others? >>> >>> For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning? >>> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
