That looks about like a couple of ours.. 30-40Mb peaks... and this is on
20MHz channels.
We have around 30 APs deployed, and about 300 SMs. Adding new ones every
day. We've had pretty good luck with ePMP, with a few exceptions...
If you have a bridge-looped client, it wreaks havoc on the network even
with STP enabled, until you disable the client radio.
GPS-synced units don't have very good built-in surge protection
comparing to Canopy. We've had complete loss of ePMP units on a tower
while the 450's and FSK's were chirping away right next to them (this is
with shielded cable and surge suppression).
Channel reuse works as advertised, as long as the antennas have proper
f/b ratio. I do wish they were able to talk a little louder on 5.4GHz
DFS band though.
pretty pleased so far, considering the price.
Vlad
On 6/2/2016 2:49 PM, Josh Baird wrote:
This is our most loaded 5Ghz ePMP AP:
Inline image 1
Inline image 2
Users on this AP have plans from 1.5-10Mbps.
I think it averages 70-80% of downlink frame usage during peak times,
but I don't have a graph available because Cambium won't expose this
as a percentage via SNMP (you have to look at the real-time value in
the web UI).
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:41 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
we are moving to epmp for cheap in 5ghz, the most populated ap
only has like 12 users on 12/2 plans up to 8 miles, I dont see it
scaling well compared to 450, but much better than the ubnt could
ever dream. Its sync lets us do ABAB with no notable hit yet.
3ghz we are moving to 450 from a mix of ubnt shit and 320 garbage
(though the 320 has been a beast) because the 1x gets us the edge
of nlos
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Josh Luthman
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
PMP450 is better. It will win the interference war. It will
offer a bit better bits/hz. If the revenue supports it, use it.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Matt
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti
we tried and
some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested
but so far
have not deployed more then couple test links.
For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the
differences
you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among
others?
For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was
the reasoning?
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of
the team.
