I have 200+ clients i'm ready to test it on! :) ----- Original Message ----- From: Mathew Howard To: af Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 10:52 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
Yeah, that'll definitely be interesting... if they ever actually release it. On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:34 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <[email protected]> wrote: Still waiting... Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone ----- Reply message ----- From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP Date: Thu, Jun 2, 2016 10:30 PM UBNT is supposed to be coming out with PRISM-AC on 2.4. Will be interesting to see how it does. On Jun 2, 2016 4:49 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> wrote: Your welcome, I guess? =) I'd rather be proving you wrong so we can gut Ubnt 2.4 and put up ePMP 2.4. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:47 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <[email protected]> wrote: Thank you for proving my point ;) ----- Original Message ----- From: Josh Luthman To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 4:09 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP No...it's not. The EPMP 2.4 radios just suck at penetration. I've done Ubnt KPP and IT Elite - they all performed terribly. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:59 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <[email protected]> wrote: hmm, i will check into that. Pretty sure with ubnt we're using kp performance. With epmp, i think it is bundled antennas... ----- Original Message ----- From: Ken Hohhof To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:50 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP Jay, I suspect the difference you are seeing may be mainly in the antennas. 2.4 GHz from any vendor should penetrate the same, the radio waves don’t care what brand radio launched them. And I think the difference between the platforms will be most evident in low interference environment where they can achieve their full modulation and throughput. With low SNR, I think it’s kind of like arguing Ferrari vs Porsche for off road racing, neither will be able to show off its capabilities. Receiver sensitivity and bits/sec/Hz won’t matter. From: CBB - Jay Fuller Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:28 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP Also interested in interference rejection of the pmp450 - is there any (in 2.4) we are getting better foliage penetration with ubnt 2.4 than epmp 2.4 - - and from the performance of the epmp 2.4 i wish wish wish it penetrated better! ----- Original Message ----- From: Matt To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:25 PM Subject: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far have not deployed more then couple test links. For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others? For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning?
