Omni to a sector, of course. You're probably getting more than 2 db unless it was a bonkers big omni and super small sector.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <[email protected]> wrote: > I have moved from pmp100 to 450 on 2.4ghz. Didn't do a cluster though. > Went from a 2.4FSK on a 12db Omni to a two 450 sectors from KP 120 beam > width (think 14db) . Was able to hook up every single customer I has on the > FSK to the 450 and some were near-LOS. The 450 in 2.4ghz actually has > impressively decent nLOS. I think its a lot better than the 3.65 for NLOS. > ( I have used all the 450 frequency bands except 900) > > If you thinking about going 450 in 2.4 and you already have FSK up on 2.4 > and nothing abmormal with your noise floor then do it. You'll love it. The > 450 is actually better because you can run 10-mhz channels to get around > some of the noise in 2.4 vs the FSK which was stuck at 20mhz > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So has anyone moved a PMP100 2.4 cluster too PMP450 2.4 and how did >> that go? With PMP100 in 2.4 we do pretty good on near LOS >> connections. Only deployed PMP450 in 3.6 and 5ghz so far though. >> >> >> > We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and >> > some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far >> > have not deployed more then couple test links. >> > >> > For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences >> > you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others? >> > >> > For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning? >> > >
