So the device is already DC powered and you need to have terminals rather than the barrel connectors. Do I have a basic understanding?
From: Joe Novak Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2016 10:29 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone using the new Mikrotik CCR with passive cooling? I'll try to snap some pictures on Tuesday when I'm back at the office. I really want some DC terminals on my cloud cores. On Jul 3, 2016 8:57 AM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: Still not totally sure what that photo of the PCB means. From: Erich Kaiser Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2016 8:18 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone using the new Mikrotik CCR with passive cooling? Most of the CCRs have 1 PSU, but two header power connectors, if you look at Faisal's links you can see what we mean. It really would be a simple product to produce. low input cost, probably could sell for $25/piece. It should have screw terminals labeled with input voltage allowed and pos /neg. You could even put in some type of fused /surge protected solution if you wanted to get creative :) Erich Kaiser North Central Tower [email protected] Office: 630-621-4804 Cell: 630-777-9291 On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: I have not really been following this thread. Give me some reference links so I can understand what it is you need. From: Erich Kaiser Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2016 5:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone using the new Mikrotik CCR with passive cooling? Would be nice if they made a module that would fit into existing AC Plug hole it could have the primary and secondary terminals on it. Chuck? Erich Kaiser North Central Tower [email protected] Office: 630-621-4804 Cell: 630-777-9291 On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <[email protected]> wrote: FYI... http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=69422 http://shop.meconet.de/Hardware-component-parts/Accessories/DC-power-cable-for-MikroTik-CCR-CRS-25cm::116243.html?language=en :) Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "David Milholen" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 6:04:10 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone using the new Mikrotik CCR with passive cooling? I am not a large WIsp but with 20 sites and more being added each year where I have a Mikrotik at every site plus additional Mikrotik switches to go at the larger sites. Maybe a small drop in the bucket but hey even if they had a module that would replace the power supply with terminals I would buy enough for all my sites and extra for new ones. I am sure Someone (Chuck) could figure it out. Even if it were only for a few Rack mount series. All of our sites have some sort of DC backup no UPS. This includes the few we have with generators. On 6/30/2016 9:24 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: Maybe not so much in the USA, where electricity is plentiful, but Mikrotik is wildly popular in places like Nepal and developing nations in Africa. The line between WISP and ISP is blurry when a place never had terrestrial/wireline infrastructure of any sort to begin with. On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: Not many. To be fair, "remote deployments" are a tiny subset of WISPs, which is a tiny subset of ISPs, which is a subset of "people who deploy mikrotik". On Jun 30, 2016 9:18 PM, "David Milholen" <[email protected]> wrote: WHOOPIE POE BIG DEAL! [I want my MTV...] External Power lugs Come On Mikrotik ... How many of us use these at remote sites and have direct DC connect for power Makes for efficient and less heat when doing UPS deployments. On 6/30/2016 9:08 PM, [email protected] wrote: You can also power them off a standard PoE switch which is cool. On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: I actually just deployed 2 today as 1Gbps active demarcs. The dual power supply version went in at a different place last week. On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: > I could see this being quite useful for small off-grid solar sites, such as > a hilltop used as an intermediate PTP relay that also has a few sectors... > > $425 for the version without SFP+, $495 for the one with SFP+ > > http://routerboard.com/CCR1009-8G-1S-1SplusPC > > http://i.mt.lv/routerboard/files/CCR1009-8G-1S-1SplusPC-151223131816.pdf > > -- --
