Well, the passively cooled CCR1009 with already take 14-57VDC, so that's a start.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:58 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > Honestly, what I'd rather see is a DC-DC converter built into the CCR > chassis. DC lugs/terminals in place of the AC input. 20-60VDC input. Input > polarity agnostic (for +24, +48 or -48 sites). Obviously the output side > would be regulated +24. > > Sure, that can all be done externally, but I can still dream, right? > > > On 7/5/2016 7:49 PM, Bruce Robertson wrote: > > It would also be helpful if it worked with the other CCR models. Then, > all we need is a DC power supply option for the CCR1072. > > On 07/05/2016 09:11 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: > > If you have what you removed for me to measure etc, it would help if I was > to do something custom that fits properly and does what folks need. > > *From:* Chris Wright <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 05, 2016 10:09 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Anyone using the new Mikrotik CCR with passive > cooling? > > > We’ve gutted a few CCR1009’s and done exactly this. > > > > Chris Wright > > Network Administrator > > Velociter Wireless > > 209-838-1221 x115 > > > > *From:* Af [ <[email protected]>mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *David Milholen > *Sent:* Saturday, July 02, 2016 3:04 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Anyone using the new Mikrotik CCR with passive > cooling? > > > > I am not a large WIsp but with 20 sites and more being added each year > where I have a Mikrotik at every site plus additional Mikrotik switches to > go at the larger sites. > > Maybe a small drop in the bucket but hey even if they had a module that > would replace the power supply with terminals I would buy enough for all my > sites and extra for new ones. > > I am sure Someone (Chuck) could figure it out. Even if it were only for a > few Rack mount series. > > All of our sites have some sort of DC backup no UPS. This includes the few > we have with generators. > > > > > > On 6/30/2016 9:24 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > > Maybe not so much in the USA, where electricity is plentiful, but Mikrotik > is wildly popular in places like Nepal and developing nations in Africa. > The line between WISP and ISP is blurry when a place never had > terrestrial/wireline infrastructure of any sort to begin with. > > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Not many. To be fair, "remote deployments" are a tiny subset of WISPs, > which is a tiny subset of ISPs, which is a subset of "people who deploy > mikrotik". > > On Jun 30, 2016 9:18 PM, "David Milholen" < <[email protected]> > [email protected]> wrote: > > WHOOPIE POE BIG DEAL! > > [I want my MTV...] External Power lugs Come On Mikrotik ... > > How many of us use these at remote sites and have direct DC connect for > power > > Makes for efficient and less heat when doing UPS deployments. > > > > > > On 6/30/2016 9:08 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > You can also power them off a standard PoE switch which is cool. > > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I actually just deployed 2 today as 1Gbps active demarcs. > > The dual power supply version went in at a different place last week. > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Eric Kuhnke < <[email protected]> > [email protected]> wrote: > > I could see this being quite useful for small off-grid solar sites, such > as > > a hilltop used as an intermediate PTP relay that also has a few > sectors... > > > > $425 for the version without SFP+, $495 for the one with SFP+ > > > > <http://routerboard.com/CCR1009-8G-1S-1SplusPC> > http://routerboard.com/CCR1009-8G-1S-1SplusPC > > > > > <http://i.mt.lv/routerboard/files/CCR1009-8G-1S-1SplusPC-151223131816.pdf> > http://i.mt.lv/routerboard/files/CCR1009-8G-1S-1SplusPC-151223131816.pdf > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > -- > !DSPAM:2,577bdc3239291778719893! > > > >
