I'm of the opinion that unbundling is the future, so even if the solution isn't perfect it should be a good stop gap that won't cost a ton of money to get started with. I just can't see investing in a full headend and associated infrastructure at this point in the game.
On Monday, July 4, 2016, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > There are downsides to the solution he has as well. It all depends on how > much control you need, and if X channel is important to your subscriber > base or not. It also depends on the feature set you want to offer your > customers (to truly compete with cable cos). > On Jul 3, 2016 8:42 PM, "Jason McKemie" <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> There is going to have to be something new come to market. With the way >> things are moving, it's not worth investing in a full setup like most >> companies are using right now. The system Chuck is working on could be >> worthwhile when available. >> >> On Sunday, July 3, 2016, Aaron Fitzgerald <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> I'd like to look into providing TV services to our customers. Where do I >>> even start? >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> Aaron Fitzgerald - CEO/CIO >>> wiFitz Network Services >>> Serving NE Iowa's Creative Corridor >>> Phone: 319/540-8999 >>> Web: http://www.wifitz.net >>> >>> wiFitz is a service of Fitzgerald Embedded, LLC >>> >>
