Awesome. Thank you for the quick replies.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Kade Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: > It'll work just fine. We actually have a couple redundant links using > RSTP that are just SMs pointing to another tower. > > Like Ken, said, it's not a long term solution, but for what you are doing > it would work exactly as you expect. > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have done it. Make sure SM isolation isn’t on. I wouldn’t use it as a >> long term solution, but for what you’re describing, I have done it and it >> worked. >> >> *From:* Christopher Gray <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Thursday, July 14, 2016 4:11 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] PMP100 Stand Alone / Backhaul From SM? >> >> I'm looking for a quick fix while I reconfigure some customers. >> >> I have fiber feeding a single PMP100 5 GHz AP connecting to 5 SMs. I'm >> about to lose the fiber. Can I add a 6th SM and use that connection as >> temporary backhaul? Will all the SMs effectively behave like they're just a >> L2 switch? >> >> I don't have access to the location to setup a proper backhaul. I'm >> setting up a new AP at a different location, but I'm short on time and want >> to make sure the customers stay up somehow while the new site is setup >> (recognizing it will be at a reduced capacity as a result of using airtime >> twice). >> >> -Chris >> > >
