There would be a little less fade margin, but being able to do up to 4 gigabit each direction is nice. It's all about engineering the link that meets your requirements (throughput, latency, uptime, cost).
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 8:10:12 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Trango vs UBNT 24G But they don't perform as well in the US in inclimate weather. On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: Trangos have SFPs. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP From: "Dev" < [email protected] > To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 7:05:31 PM Subject: [AFMUG] Trango vs UBNT 24G Anyone got any opinions which they’d use for a new deployment? Are the UBNT links solid or do they fall on their face at capacity? Are the Trango’s solid? Any others I should be looking at in 24G? What’s your experience?
