IIRC, the dish model won't the throughput potential the 4x4 panels will.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> To: "af" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 8:19:41 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Trango vs UBNT 24G Also, Trango is supposed to be coming out with a dish model fairly soon, which should take care of that problem... there are certainly different advantages to each, depending on what you need. But to answer one question, the UBNT links are solid, as long as the link is engineered properly. On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: There would be a little less fade margin, but being able to do up to 4 gigabit each direction is nice. It's all about engineering the link that meets your requirements (throughput, latency, uptime, cost). ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP From: "Josh Reynolds" < [email protected] > To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 8:10:12 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Trango vs UBNT 24G But they don't perform as well in the US in inclimate weather. On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> Trangos have SFPs. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP From: "Dev" < [email protected] > To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 7:05:31 PM Subject: [AFMUG] Trango vs UBNT 24G Anyone got any opinions which they’d use for a new deployment? Are the UBNT links solid or do they fall on their face at capacity? Are the Trango’s solid? Any others I should be looking at in 24G? What’s your experience? </blockquote>
