Can the original Aircontrol handle configuring/monitoring/updating latest firmwares or latest devices? I thought it wasnt capable of anything past 5.5.x? In which case maybe you’re running vulnerable firmwares if you’re still on AC1?
> On Aug 13, 2016, at 9:16 AM, Paul Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for that note… appreciate it… > > Guess I should check in $$$job to see what we’re doing too .. pretty sure we > utilize original AC there too … > > Paul > > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On > Behalf Of Jeremy > Sent: August 13, 2016 10:40 AM > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AirControl > > That being said....the upgrade process from AC1 to AC2 left a lot to be > desired. I followed many tutorials trying to get the database to transfer, > but I lost it all. Had to rescan the network and add every device back in. > If historical data in AC is important...be aware that you may lose it all. > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Jeremy <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> AC2 is awesome. >> >> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> They changed strategy and declared AC2 the winner. There is a RC which runs >>> quite good. Does a quite good job to keep Firmware up to date and follow >>> cpe signals over time. >>> Mapping is included but uses bing. There is only a java client at the >>> moment which does not scale with higher resolution PCs. >>> >>> They promised an API and a webinterface (integration with UCRM Control >>> which is seized). >>> Should run on CRM Point in the future. >>> >>> >>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- >>> Von: Mike Hammett <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> Datum: 13.08.2016 14:06 (GMT+01:00) >>> An: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] AirControl >>>
