Did you just do two crews to make the swap faster?
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > We replaced a bunch of UBNT 3.65 links with AF3X on rocket dishes a few > years back for 5 or 6 sites for a school district. We ended up using half > the channel width and doubling throughput over the Rocket 3.65s for that > application. The district loved them... Very low latency for their VoIP, > and it was an in-place upgrade. > > We did have to discard the RF armor box on the back I believe. > > On Aug 31, 2016 2:44 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have some 3.65 M series backhaul links to upgrade, I think it's 5 >> Powerbridges and 1 Rocket. Not ready to go licensed on these links. >> >> Has anyone done a spec comparison or better yet field comparision between >> Ubiquiti's AF3X and Cambium's 450PTP? They are fairly similar, the AF3X is >> more expensive than the 450PTP because Ubiquiti prices it a lot higher than >> the AF5X. Cambium has an integrated panel version of the 450SM but doesn't >> seem to have the PTP version of that, otherwise it might be a plus when >> replacing Powerbridges. And Ubiquiti doesn't seem to have a 3 GHz version >> of their smallest airFiber dish, which would have been a plus for AF3X. >> >> I don't see achieving max throughput on an AF3X since 30-50 MHz channels >> don't seem usable. So that maybe takes away some of the airFiber secret >> sauce. >> >> I guess another approach would be to use a 450 Lite AP and an SM, since >> those are parts we already use and stock. Yet another approach would be to >> use the lower 5 GHz bands instead of 3.65. >> >>
