is the mikrotik bonded to the ground the SS is directly??

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:21 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:

> I have several sites with GigE-APC-HV's and GigE-POE-APC's that run GigE
> with no issues, other than them clamping during thunderstorms and cause
> some CRC errors which is perfectly acceptable. 450's, licensed radios. All
> kinds of stuff. No 450i APs though. Well, most of the 450s I just leave at
> the default Auto 100F/100H/10F/10H since there's no real reason for gigabit
> until we get 30MHz channel support. But I have tested it with Forrest's new
> GigE PowerInjector+Sync injectors and it does work fine.
>
> The only thing I can think of is to try turning off the sync pulse on the
> SyncInjector and see what you get. Per port via software, or just unplug
> the SyncPipe if you're on site.
>
> On 9/8/2016 6:30 PM, Matt wrote:
>
>> I am currently testing an ePMP powered off a Netonix switch with 65’ of
>>> cable to the GigE-APC surge suppressor and then 165’ to the AP.
>>> Rock solid at Gige.  Everything looks good.
>>>
>>> Have you tried to cut and isolate.  Say with a Cambium power supply and
>>> a laptop.
>>> Start at the AP and work your way back adding components until you find
>>> what is causing it to break?
>>>
>>> I know that now and then the pins in the RJ45s in the surge suppressors
>>> and other components can get a bit contaminated and some alcohol and a q
>>> tip will fix the problem.
>>>
>> Went back today.
>>
>> I have Mikrotik CRS > 52 volts > PacketFlux Gige SyncInjector > GigEAPC
>>>>> HV Rev A.1 > 100 foot STP > PMP450i.  Will not do 1000base.
>>>>>
>>>> Removed the GigEAPC HV and replaced with a Monoprice RJ-45 coupler.
>> Linked and stayed up at 1gbps.  Put the GigeAPC back in.  Mikrotik
>> logs show.
>>
>> 15:51:53 interface,info ether9-slave-local link down
>> 15:51:55 interface,info ether9-slave-local link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
>> 15:51:56 interface,info ether9-slave-local link down
>> 15:51:58 interface,info ether9-slave-local link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
>> 15:51:59 interface,info ether9-slave-local link down
>> 15:52:01 interface,info ether9-slave-local link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
>> 15:52:02 interface,info ether9-slave-local link down
>> 15:52:04 interface,info ether9-slave-local link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
>> 15:52:05 interface,info ether9-slave-local link down
>> 15:52:07 interface,info ether9-slave-local link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
>> 15:52:08 interface,info ether9-slave-local link down
>> 15:52:09 interface,info ether9-slave-local link up (speed 100M, full
>> duplex)
>>
>> In the end it gives up and goes back too 100M.
>>
>> Also, have Mikrotik CRS125-24G-1S -> thirty foot of unshielded cat-5e
>> -> GigEAPC-HV -> Mikrotik CRS125-24G-1S
>>
>> It will only link at 100M also but if I remove the GigEAPC and replace
>> with monoprice RJ45 coupler it links and stays at 1Gbps.  Both routers
>> on latest firmware and stable/current ROS.
>>
>> Have tried different GigEAPC units, new ends and have checked that
>> everything is grounded correctly to electrical ground.
>>
>> Ideas?
>>
>


-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to