Maybe something like this: http://lucasdist.com/tv-wall-mounts-1/
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > No, I wish I did as they had some really good stuff. > -----Original Message----- From: Nate Burke Sent: Monday, September 19, > 2016 9:26 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Securing a TV so > that it doesn't walk off > Do you remember the manufacturer? > > On 9/19/2016 10:24 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: > >> I have seen wall mounts in hotels that seem impossible to remove. I even >> googled the manufacturer of the mount and downloaded their instruction >> manual. It took a 3 foot long phillips screwdriver to reach in there and >> remove a screw in order to get it off. That is after you pried off this >> metal plug from the screwdriver access hole. (I was trying to access an >> HDMI port, not steal the TV). >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Jim Bouse [Brazos WiFi] >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 9:20 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Securing a TV so that it doesn't walk off >> >> I would imagine a wall mount with tamper resistant screws would do it. >> >> Jim Bouse >> Owner >> Mobile IT Pro - Brazos WiFi >> 979-985-5912 >> [email protected] >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 9:53 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Securing a TV so that it doesn't walk off >> >> Either that or an alarm when a cable gets cut or unplugged. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Nate Burke >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 8:31 AM >> To: Animal Farm >> Subject: [AFMUG] OT: Securing a TV so that it doesn't walk off >> >> I'm hoping some of you that do work in public places/schools can help me >> out. I need to mount a TV to the wall in a public place, very close to an >> unmonitored exterior door. What's the best method of keeping it from >> walking off. Back in the day it was those adhesive plates with a security >> cable. are those still the best? >> >> Thanks, >> Nate >> > >
