Maybe something like this:  http://lucasdist.com/tv-wall-mounts-1/


On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

> No, I wish I did as they had some really good stuff.
> -----Original Message----- From: Nate Burke Sent: Monday, September 19,
> 2016 9:26 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Securing a TV so
> that it doesn't walk off
> Do you remember the manufacturer?
>
> On 9/19/2016 10:24 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>
>> I have seen wall mounts in hotels that seem impossible to remove.  I even
>> googled the manufacturer of the mount and downloaded their instruction
>> manual.  It took a 3 foot long phillips screwdriver to reach in there and
>> remove a screw in order to get it off.  That is after you pried off this
>> metal plug from the screwdriver access hole.  (I was trying to access an
>> HDMI port, not steal the TV).
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Jim Bouse [Brazos WiFi]
>> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 9:20 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Securing a TV so that it doesn't walk off
>>
>> I would imagine a wall mount with tamper resistant screws would do it.
>>
>> Jim Bouse
>> Owner
>> Mobile IT Pro - Brazos WiFi
>> 979-985-5912
>> j...@brazoswifi.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
>> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 9:53 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Securing a TV so that it doesn't walk off
>>
>> Either that or an alarm when a cable gets cut or unplugged.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nate Burke
>> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 8:31 AM
>> To: Animal Farm
>> Subject: [AFMUG] OT: Securing a TV so that it doesn't walk off
>>
>> I'm hoping some of you that do work in public places/schools can help me
>> out.  I need to mount a TV to the wall in a public place, very close to an
>> unmonitored exterior door.  What's the best method of keeping it from
>> walking off.  Back in the day it was those adhesive plates with a security
>> cable.  are those still the best?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nate
>>
>
>

Reply via email to