holy cow, I dont know how the end user performance is right now, but that harq=2 made all these bastard CPEs manageable again what does harq ack nack mean btw? I havent looked at the 320 ap administration guide in a long time, i dont even remember why i opted not to manipulate the flows and enable harq at the time, i was probably drunk
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > Yup > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: 10/7/2016 11:04:32 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 > > > I will try these things, I do appreciate it, I also set cpe isolation to > block cpe destined packets, this should stop some idle traffic between > units shouldnt it? > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Our power company is also using 3.65ghz Wimax as part of their smartgrid >> system. Sounds like it is a backhaul to their 900mhz stuff. >> >> They don't have any authentication on their Wimax system (I presume they >> limit network access by other means), so we tripped over them when some CPE >> connected to their BS and the customers called us because they had no >> internet access. >> >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >> To: "Animal Farm" <[email protected]> >> Sent: 10/6/2016 10:25:50 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 >> >> >> GE MDS is pushing 3.65 SCADA allot >> >> On Oct 6, 2016 8:17 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> George, is this due to some weird weather by you? >>> >>> >>> >>> Oh, and one thing to consider if you have 3.65 interference, I found out >>> ComEd is using 3.65 WiMAX for smartgrid, I don’t know if this is the top of >>> the hierarchy for their 900 MHz stuff, or SCADA to substations. One tower >>> by me they have 4 sectors and I think each AP only feeds 1-2 CPEs. It >>> didn’t help that they totally messed up the lat/lon of their tower when >>> they registered it in ULS. Once I looked at the CPE locations and drew >>> lines following the stated azimuth, I saw they converged on a tower next to >>> a ComEd facility. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy >>> /sarcasm >>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:05 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 >>> >>> >>> >>> lol well it wont be coming from us for a while, we are going 3ghz silent >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:58 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Dude, I'm seeing multipath and ducting like a somebitch. Started around >>> dusk. Don't beat your head into your desk. I'm seeing some 11GHz links go >>> from their nominal -45ish to like -35 to -60 in just a couple minutes, and >>> BER alarms like crazy. This is teh suck. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/6/2016 8:47 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>> >>> There is some nutty madness going on on a large portion of our 320 >>> network, it has hit multiple sites at once. >>> >>> I know much of its self induced due to too many marginal installs on >>> very limited access points >>> >>> >>> >>> good CINR to SMs, even matrix B I cant even get into to manage. >>> >>> >>> >>> uplink MCS for the most part looks good until i get into the frame >>> utilization, tons of 16qam 1/2 and 100% usage with only 6-12 mbps throughput >>> >>> >>> >>> I have been shifting frequencies across the network because it presented >>> like interference, and a change on one AP results in required cascade >>> changes across the 3ghz network since 320 sync doesnt actually work. >>> >>> >>> >>> APs are basically default layer 2, no profiles changed, 7mhz channels >>> mostly ABCD 90s and some split APs. sub counts range from 10 to 35 >>> >>> >>> >>> I migrated a distant part of the network to 10mhz channels and am not >>> seeing this issue, but subscriber counts are low >>> >>> >>> >>> Im at my wits end on this nonsense and am about to just put every AP on >>> the network in SA mode to get a visual on what my spectrum looks like >>> >>> >>> >>> we did turn up a 450 facing southwest ten miles south of another 320 AP >>> thats facing south, it blinded the SMs to the 320 on a near channel even >>> though they were only in the back lobe, but this is far from the others >>> >>> >>> >>> any advice from you other guys stuck with wimax would be appreciated >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
