I hated dealing with those damn things when I had them on the network. HARQ did seem to help, but they just seemed insanely sensitive to interference. It didn't help that Springnet (now Rise) pretty much raised the noise floor to an unusable level in every direction.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_automatic_repeat_request On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:45 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > holy cow, I dont know how the end user performance is right now, but that > harq=2 made all these bastard CPEs manageable again > what does harq ack nack mean btw? I havent looked at the 320 ap > administration guide in a long time, i dont even remember why i opted not > to manipulate the flows and enable harq at the time, i was probably drunk > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yup >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Sent: 10/7/2016 11:04:32 AM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 >> >> >> I will try these things, I do appreciate it, I also set cpe isolation to >> block cpe destined packets, this should stop some idle traffic between >> units shouldnt it? >> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Our power company is also using 3.65ghz Wimax as part of their smartgrid >>> system. Sounds like it is a backhaul to their 900mhz stuff. >>> >>> They don't have any authentication on their Wimax system (I presume they >>> limit network access by other means), so we tripped over them when some CPE >>> connected to their BS and the customers called us because they had no >>> internet access. >>> >>> >>> ------ Original Message ------ >>> From: "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >>> To: "Animal Farm" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: 10/6/2016 10:25:50 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 >>> >>> >>> GE MDS is pushing 3.65 SCADA allot >>> >>> On Oct 6, 2016 8:17 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> George, is this due to some weird weather by you? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Oh, and one thing to consider if you have 3.65 interference, I found >>>> out ComEd is using 3.65 WiMAX for smartgrid, I don’t know if this is the >>>> top of the hierarchy for their 900 MHz stuff, or SCADA to substations. One >>>> tower by me they have 4 sectors and I think each AP only feeds 1-2 CPEs. >>>> It didn’t help that they totally messed up the lat/lon of their tower when >>>> they registered it in ULS. Once I looked at the CPE locations and drew >>>> lines following the stated azimuth, I saw they converged on a tower next to >>>> a ComEd facility. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy >>>> /sarcasm >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 6, 2016 9:05 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] *&%$ 320 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> lol well it wont be coming from us for a while, we are going 3ghz silent >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:58 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dude, I'm seeing multipath and ducting like a somebitch. Started around >>>> dusk. Don't beat your head into your desk. I'm seeing some 11GHz links go >>>> from their nominal -45ish to like -35 to -60 in just a couple minutes, and >>>> BER alarms like crazy. This is teh suck. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/6/2016 8:47 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>>> >>>> There is some nutty madness going on on a large portion of our 320 >>>> network, it has hit multiple sites at once. >>>> >>>> I know much of its self induced due to too many marginal installs on >>>> very limited access points >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> good CINR to SMs, even matrix B I cant even get into to manage. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> uplink MCS for the most part looks good until i get into the frame >>>> utilization, tons of 16qam 1/2 and 100% usage with only 6-12 mbps >>>> throughput >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have been shifting frequencies across the network because it >>>> presented like interference, and a change on one AP results in required >>>> cascade changes across the 3ghz network since 320 sync doesnt actually >>>> work. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> APs are basically default layer 2, no profiles changed, 7mhz channels >>>> mostly ABCD 90s and some split APs. sub counts range from 10 to 35 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I migrated a distant part of the network to 10mhz channels and am not >>>> seeing this issue, but subscriber counts are low >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Im at my wits end on this nonsense and am about to just put every AP on >>>> the network in SA mode to get a visual on what my spectrum looks like >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> we did turn up a 450 facing southwest ten miles south of another 320 AP >>>> thats facing south, it blinded the SMs to the 320 on a near channel even >>>> though they were only in the back lobe, but this is far from the others >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> any advice from you other guys stuck with wimax would be appreciated >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
