That probably makes as much sense as I was trying to say. I think it was "what a great many people deem to be a right" or something like that.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 3:04 PM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, you need better auto correct. I can’t decipher “dem to be a touchy”. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Lewis Bergman > *Sent:* Saturday, October 29, 2016 2:49 PM > > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber > > > > I understand the attractiveness of the big government to solve a problem. > It just always that is a fairly poor short term solution and an even worse > long term one that always serves to stifle innovationand extend the life of > entities that should already be out of business. > > I live in a rural area but don't think I deserve a great hospital 5 > minutes from my house or fiber or a great many conveniences. What a great > many dem to be a touchy amazes me. I guess we can all get what we want > until the whole thing collapses one day. > > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 2:35 PM Lewis Bergman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Sounds like someone should read Atlas Shrugged > > Why not. If the government wants to help commerce, it should help > commerce. > If they can pay farmers for not farming, they should pay WISPS they injure. > If they wipe out service providers they should be forced to buy them out. > Just like imminent domain. You want my field for your highway, buy it. > Building a dam that wipes out my farm, buy it. There is an implied > covenant > of good faith and fair dealing whenever the government does a deal. This > is > part of contract law everywhere. The the government is one party, the > people are the other. It is not good faith or fair dealing to hurt the > people. > > > >We don't pay buggy-and-whip tax on our cars either. > Actually you do, federal excise tax on tires... > > Jared > >
