Funny. I was trying to figure that out too. You beat me to it.
I also tend to parse what Lewis is saying based on my feelings about the
aggressiveness of his auto correct...
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 10/29/2016 1:04 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
OK, you need better auto correct. I can’t decipher “dem to be a touchy”.
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Lewis Bergman
*Sent:* Saturday, October 29, 2016 2:49 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
I understand the attractiveness of the big government to solve a
problem. It just always that is a fairly poor short term solution and
an even worse long term one that always serves to stifle innovationand
extend the life of entities that should already be out of business.
I live in a rural area but don't think I deserve a great hospital 5
minutes from my house or fiber or a great many conveniences. What a
great many dem to be a touchy amazes me. I guess we can all get what
we want until the whole thing collapses one day.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 2:35 PM Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com
<mailto:lewis.berg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Sounds like someone should read Atlas Shrugged
Why not. If the government wants to help commerce, it should
help commerce.
If they can pay farmers for not farming, they should pay WISPS
they injure.
If they wipe out service providers they should be forced to
buy them out.
Just like imminent domain. You want my field for your
highway, buy it.
Building a dam that wipes out my farm, buy it. There is an
implied covenant
of good faith and fair dealing whenever the government does a
deal. This is
part of contract law everywhere. The the government is one
party, the
people are the other. It is not good faith or fair dealing to
hurt the
people.
>We don't pay buggy-and-whip tax on our cars either.
Actually you do, federal excise tax on tires...
Jared
