Can you walk away?
Do you want other investors?

From: Travis Johnson 
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 3:34 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Travis and Shark Tank

The actual deal paperwork is substantially different than the show... and I am 
now hearing from others that have been on previous shows that this is "normal". 
They have added royalties, commissions, bonuses and other "perks" (free product 
at cost), and they aren't really putting any cash into the business... instead 
they want an "option" to purchase equity at the offer price, but up to 5 years 
from now.

As I said, we are still in negotiations. I am guessing most people on the show 
think this is a "normal" deal and so they accept it. Luckily for Megan (the 
Founder), we are involved. :)   Having just completed a Series A investment 
round for another company (raising $7 million, including a large investment 
from Salesforce Ventures), we have a lot of experience with putting deals 
together. As it is written now, it's a terrible deal... but this company has 
some huge potential... so we are still working it out. LOL

Our biggest irritation is when someone says "that's just how we do it" or "this 
is normal". We have never accepted any investment deal (on either side of the 
table) as it was originally written... even with someone like Salesforce 
Ventures, who has done over 280 investments in the last 5 years. We made them 
make changes on their "standard" investment documents that we weren't 
comfortable with. We have made large investment banks make changes to their 
loan documents (requiring a Senior VP approval) in order for them to get the 
deal. :)

Travis



On 11/7/2016 2:06 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:

  Doesn’t sound like it if there are commissions and royalties now.  

  From: Chuck Hogg 
  Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 1:47 PM
  To: [email protected] 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Travis and Shark Tank

  The big question, is it still what the offer was on the show?

  Regards,
  Chuck

  On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Travis Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:

    Correct. We only got the actual deal paperwork from him three weeks ago.

    Travis


    On 11/7/2016 10:56 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:

      Wow.  So since June and still no deal with Daymond?

      Regards,
      Chuck

      On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Travis Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:

        Yes, filmed in June. We spent $4,000 on FB ads and generated $108,000 
in sales. We also blew up the FB and Instagram pages, and ran a BOGO sale all 
at the same time. We have over 200k followers on FB right now.

        Travis



        On 11/7/2016 10:35 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

          So it must have been filmed in June.
          She mentioned dumping a bunch of coin on advertising.  Was that all 
on FB?

          From: Travis Johnson 
          Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 10:18 AM
          To: [email protected] 
          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Travis and Shark Tank

          Honestly, not much... :(

          Over the last 3 days, we have seen about $70,000 in additional 
sales... so it made a difference, but not what we were hoping for. Our single 
biggest day was in June this year, when we went all out on marketing and FB ads 
and we did $108,000 in sales in a single day.

          Travis



          On 11/7/2016 10:07 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

            What did the show to to sales in the past few days?

            From: Travis Johnson 
            Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 10:05 AM
            To: [email protected] 
            Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Travis and Shark Tank

            Hi,

            The Shark Tank episode was very edited and chopped together. She 
was actually in front of the sharks for over 90 minutes... they cut it down to 
8. Here is the basic summary:

            She started the company with her brother after he gave her about 
$2,000 to buy inventory. They tried out for Shark Tank (4 years ago) and didn't 
make it past the first stage. Another person saw a local news episode about her 
and the company, and contacted her. He gave her $3,000 in cash, and paid her 
rent for a year in exchange for 50% of the company (basically buying out her 
brother). 

            Those two were involved for about 2 months before they realized 
they needed more money and expertise to make anything happen. They contacted me 
via email, and we had a meeting. We told them in the meeting we would do an 
investment, and asked how much and what they would give up. They told us 
$30,000 for 50% of the company. We gave them exactly what they asked for. Also, 
at this point, her total sales for all of 2014 was $7,000. That's TOTAL 
SALES... not profit. So there are four of us, each at 25% ownership right now.

            We then took the company from $9,000 total sales in 2014 to $1 
million in sales in 2015. We provided business experience, obtained a line of 
credit at the bank, helped setup the e-commerce website, helped finance 
inventory (doing a personal loan to the company), etc.

            We then put a CEO in late 2015 that has helped take the company 
from $1 million in 2015 to now we will do over $4 million in 2016.

            There is not a single person I know of that would have invested 
$30k to a business that had only done $7k in total sales for the year. No 
shark, no other investor I have ever talked to about this deal. Everyone just 
laughs when I tell them.

            This episode was actually filmed about three months ago. We only 
received paperwork from Daymond's group about two weeks ago, and we are still 
in negotiation with him. The deal paperwork is SUBSTANTIALLY different than the 
episode shows ($400k for 20%). He has had no involvement with the company thus 
far, and does not have any ownership or equity yet.

            Reality TV is not very real. LOL

            Travis



            On 11/7/2016 8:56 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:

              So Travis, are you a 1/5th partner now instead of a 1/4th?  Not 
bad that you got in that cheap and Daymond paid some major change.

              Regards,
              Chuck

              On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> 
wrote:

                Odd, I was expecting Kevin but you got Daymond and nothing was 
mentioned about royalties.  
                Did she say she had $100K revenue in one day?
                What e commerce platform?
                Where was that ad buy she mentioned?






            On 11/7/2016 8:56 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:

              So Travis, are you a 1/5th partner now instead of a 1/4th?  Not 
bad that you got in that cheap and Daymond paid some major change.

              Regards,
              Chuck

              On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> 
wrote:

                Odd, I was expecting Kevin but you got Daymond and nothing was 
mentioned about royalties.  
                Did she say she had $100K revenue in one day?
                What e commerce platform?
                Where was that ad buy she mentioned?












Reply via email to