Most 60GHz gear for indoors has been for video application such as TV or
presentations in small rooms... I am sure it would be good for gyms and
halls for cameras and such.

On Nov 12, 2016 10:42 AM, "Sterling Jacobson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, that sounds about right.
>
>
>
> Taking a closer look at the properties of 802.11ad, maybe they need to
> make a “thin” device for each room with Ethernet.
>
>
>
> Something like an in wall (1Gang) unit that has POE from the central
> location, a GigE Ethernet port and a thin 6’ flat cable with a small 60GHz
> array at the end that sticks on the wall.
>
>
>
> Then you could get that antenna up higher for LOS in the room without
> using a ceiling AP?
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Harold Bledsoe
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 12, 2016 10:03 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 802.11ad Deployment in a House
>
>
>
> I think the idea is that 11ad will be opportunistic offload. For
> enterprise it makes a lot of sense because you have dense users and ceiling
> mounted APs.  For home it is a little more challenging because you would
> need one in each room that you want to "offload" to 60GHz.
>
>
>
> The applications where 60ghz makes sense is where you would think
> seriously about using a wire (where you need high bandwidth, low latency -
> basically a wire experience).  Video streaming, gaming, that sort of stuff
> would be the low-hanging fruit.
>
>
>
> -Hal
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 8:06 AM Seth Mattinen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 11/12/16 7:04 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
> > I would think that 60 GHz "might" be useful if the AP and a UHD TV were
> > in the same room, and your 2.4GHz and 5GHz channels were all trash
> > because of close proximity of neighbors.
> >
> > But overall, I think it would be more trouble than most consumers can
> > deal with.
>
>
> I've been using a 60GHz HDMI bridge for several years between the AV
> gear and the projector. Works great unless the cat sits on it because
> it's warm.
>
> ~Seth
>
>

Reply via email to