What's the breakdown voltage on the insulation for a 22 AWG wire?
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/15/2016 6:54 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Perhaps jack it up to 1000 volts, 12 amps...
Run your whole house off of a cat 5.
Now that would be an interesting youtube video.
*From:* Bill Prince
*Sent:* Tuesday, November 15, 2016 7:51 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux & 450M Timing
Using that kind of power scheme, and 48 volts, you're talking about
over 500 watts? No way!
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/15/2016 6:26 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Tower ground earth ground etc, like Trango does.
Yes, I do, the manufacturer of the jacks I use rates them at 1.5 amps.
But you better not plug them in under load...
*From:* Bill Prince
*Sent:* Tuesday, November 15, 2016 7:22 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux & 450M Timing
All one polarity? Where's the drain? You really think you can get
1-1/2 amps through each of those teeny little RJ45 connections?
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/15/2016 6:14 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
I am talking about all wires being one polarity. I think I can get
12 amps without melting anything.
*From:* Bill Prince
*Sent:* Monday, November 14, 2016 5:41 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux & 450M Timing
Let me be more clear.
The circuit that is pins 4,5 (+), and pins 7,8 (-) is one circuit.
Total of .75 amps.
The circuit that is pins 1,2 (-), and pins 3,6 (+) is one circuit.
Total of .75 amps.
That puts 375 milliamps on each pin and each wire. That's because
the power/current that is going in on pins 7 & 8, has to return on
pins 4 & 5. You can't double that.
Possibly more than I would be comfortable with anyway.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/14/2016 12:18 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Half an amp per wire on one chart, 3.5 amps on another chart.
Heating and insulation temperature rating are going to be the
limiting factors there.
Jacks I use have a 1.5 amp rating per pin.
So, I think you can get 12 amps total if the cable is short enough.
*From:* Bill Prince
*Sent:* Monday, November 14, 2016 1:11 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux & 450M Timing
Each pair is one half of a power circuit. So there are 4 halves.
There are two issues; how much current can each wire carry, and how
much current can each connector pin can carry.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/14/2016 11:59 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
There are four pairs. AF5x and the H in 24vh or 48vh POE ports of
Netonix do power over all four pairs. Speaking with Ubnt support
last week, AF5x should ideally do four pairs when possible.
48v (0.75*4a) = 144 watts
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]>
wrote:
At 48 volts, and .75 amps per pair of power wires, that would
be 36 watts + 36 watts, or 72 watts total?
Just noodling here.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/14/2016 11:38 AM, George Skorup wrote:
For the record,
http://store.packetflux.com/powerinjector-plus-sync-gigabit-version/
<http://store.packetflux.com/powerinjector-plus-sync-gigabit-version/>
says: 1A per port maximum power. (48 watts at 48 Volts)
So.. is the electronic over-current protection the 1A limit?
Or is this just outdated info? Pretty sure it's >1A because
I've "tested" it (cable leaking water into the GigE-APC, the
port didn't trip, and the card was hot as hell).
I was also unaware that Cambium won't be supporting
sync-over-power on the 450m. I imagine the ringing/bounce
issue killed that idea due to the high power consumption.
On 11/14/2016 1:00 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
The current products should power the 450M just fine. The
rating is 1A per pair per port, so at the 48V you're good up
to 96W.
On Nov 14, 2016 7:50 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]>
wrote:
The 450m pulls 70 watts. The current
SyncInjector/PowerInjector+Sync is around 1A max per
port. What you could do for now is a GigE-POE-APC and
the new aux port version SyncBox Junior.
On 11/14/2016 12:34 PM, Matt wrote:
Shouldn't the sync over power for the 450M be the
same as PMP450i?
How is the 1u sync injector coming?
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Forrest Christian
(List Account)
<[email protected]> wrote:
All of the currently shipping syncbox product
line are compatible. For sync
over power, I have the specs, but the design
isn't done yet.
On Nov 14, 2016 5:40 PM, "Sam Lambie"
<[email protected]> wrote:
A question for Forrest mostly. Have you come
up with a timing product for
the 450m AP yet? If not, have you got a
timeline for release?
Sam
--
--
Sam Lambie
Taosnet Wireless Tech.
575-758-7598 <tel:575-758-7598> Office
www.Taosnet.com <http://www.Taosnet.com>
