Just run your own mail server, heck we do that cheaply enough.  WE offer hosted 
1000 pop and webmail accounts with 1 domain for 89.99!

Or we can help you setup your own mailserver.  Don’t cost much!


Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant
MikroTik Certified 
Trainer/Consultant<http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5>
 – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com/>
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 11:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Google Apps Email

you can do this with aliases
I dont recall the details, you just authenticate using your real credentials, 
but its tied to a real account and your owned domain

Its easier just to do an smtp relay on net, (or off, it ddoesnt matter) just so 
long as you have SPF in place allowing the IP to send on your domains behalf 
youre golden. All out contract networks I set an open relay up on a windows 
server, limit it to the office network subnet, that way all the devices can 
send email, and the whole scan to email thing is a breeze since its 
unauthenticated. We used to use a dedicated email account on our rackspace, but 
a password change was a nightmare having to remember what all was configured to 
use it

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Matt 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
They won't be able to deliver to SMS addresses though.

Found this:
smtp-relay.gmail.com<http://smtp-relay.gmail.com>
https://support.google.com/a/answer/2956491?hl=en

Still does not solve my problem perfectly though.  Thinking maybe
create a group called my_phone@**** might work better and adding my
phones email address to that group.  I hate making things to
complicated.  More to remember and more notes to look through when it
needs changed.


On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Josh Luthman
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> C:\Users\jluthman>dig -t mx kyneticwifi.com<http://kyneticwifi.com> +short
> 10 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com<http://alt4.aspmx.l.google.com>.
> 1 aspmx.l.google.com<http://aspmx.l.google.com>.
> 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com<http://alt1.aspmx.l.google.com>.
> 10 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com<http://alt3.aspmx.l.google.com>.
> 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com<http://alt2.aspmx.l.google.com>.
>
> Use one of those for your SMTP.  It'll only be able to deliver to local
> addresses, though.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340<tel:937-552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:937-552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Josh Reynolds 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
>>
>> Can you explain? My email-fu is weak.
>>
>>
>> On Nov 22, 2016 10:21 AM, "Josh Baird" 
>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Or you just have an on-net SMTP server that requires authentication that
>>> can be used for things like this.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Josh Luthman
>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No.  You need another user.
>>>>
>>>> I mean you could use someone else's active user but I wouldn't do that.
>>>> I have a user that collects backups and is used for smtp auth.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340<tel:937-552-2340>
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:937-552-2343>
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Matt 
>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We use Google Apps for our business email.  Is there a way to create
>>>>> an email account that can send authenticated SMTP only without paying
>>>>> the extra $5 a month?  For instance our phone system needs to send
>>>>> mail.  Some of our Mikrotik's send mail also.  Was just looking for an
>>>>> easy way to do that?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>



--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to