Yes, you can authenticate as user 'steve' and have the sender address appear to be 'techsupport' but MAIL FROM aka envelope from will be steve. Anyone can look at the message headers and see that. Google Apps does have a cool feature called Collaborative Inbox which lets you send as the group for real, but you have to use the Gmail interface to do so. So there's really no way around it. Either pay the $5/mo or do something else.

On 11/22/2016 11:45 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
you can do this with aliases
I dont recall the details, you just authenticate using your real credentials, but its tied to a real account and your owned domain

Its easier just to do an smtp relay on net, (or off, it ddoesnt matter) just so long as you have SPF in place allowing the IP to send on your domains behalf youre golden. All out contract networks I set an open relay up on a windows server, limit it to the office network subnet, that way all the devices can send email, and the whole scan to email thing is a breeze since its unauthenticated. We used to use a dedicated email account on our rackspace, but a password change was a nightmare having to remember what all was configured to use it

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Matt <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    They won't be able to deliver to SMS addresses though.

    Found this:
    smtp-relay.gmail.com <http://smtp-relay.gmail.com>
    https://support.google.com/a/answer/2956491?hl=en
    <https://support.google.com/a/answer/2956491?hl=en>

    Still does not solve my problem perfectly though.  Thinking maybe
    create a group called my_phone@**** might work better and adding my
    phones email address to that group.  I hate making things to
    complicated.  More to remember and more notes to look through when it
    needs changed.


    On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Josh Luthman
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    wrote:
    > C:\Users\jluthman>dig -t mx kyneticwifi.com
    <http://kyneticwifi.com> +short
    > 10 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com <http://alt4.aspmx.l.google.com>.
    > 1 aspmx.l.google.com <http://aspmx.l.google.com>.
    > 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com <http://alt1.aspmx.l.google.com>.
    > 10 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com <http://alt3.aspmx.l.google.com>.
    > 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com <http://alt2.aspmx.l.google.com>.
    >
    > Use one of those for your SMTP.  It'll only be able to deliver
    to local
    > addresses, though.
    >
    >
    > Josh Luthman
    > Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
    > Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
    > 1100 Wayne St
    > Suite 1337
    > Troy, OH 45373
    >
    > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Josh Reynolds
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    > wrote:
    >>
    >> Can you explain? My email-fu is weak.
    >>
    >>
    >> On Nov 22, 2016 10:21 AM, "Josh Baird" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>> Or you just have an on-net SMTP server that requires
    authentication that
    >>> can be used for things like this.
    >>>
    >>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Josh Luthman
    >>> <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>> No.  You need another user.
    >>>>
    >>>> I mean you could use someone else's active user but I
    wouldn't do that.
    >>>> I have a user that collects backups and is used for smtp auth.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Josh Luthman
    >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
    >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
    >>>> 1100 Wayne St
    >>>> Suite 1337
    >>>> Troy, OH 45373
    >>>>
    >>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Matt
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    >>>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> We use Google Apps for our business email.  Is there a way
    to create
    >>>>> an email account that can send authenticated SMTP only
    without paying
    >>>>> the extra $5 a month?  For instance our phone system needs
    to send
    >>>>> mail.  Some of our Mikrotik's send mail also.  Was just
    looking for an
    >>>>> easy way to do that?
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >




--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to