The biggest issues for me was that (1) they were constantly changing the
UI of their proprietary "airport admin" tool, (2) The Windows version
was always a few revs behind (or would not work), (3) They would usually
default to bridge mode, and saturate the local DHCP pool, (4) would not
allow simple adjustments to channel frequencies, (5) their admin tool
was proprietary, and not just a simple web server.
There are probably another half dozen or so issues that I'm not
recalling now.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/28/2016 8:13 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I know some WISP's beef with them was because the WISP wasn't properly
IPing their network. What other concerns are there?
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com>
*To: *"Motorola III" <af@afmug.com>
*Sent: *Monday, November 28, 2016 10:07:21 AM
*Subject: *[AFMUG] OT: Apple abandoning development of wireless routers
Finally! There routers have caused more than their fair share of support
calls. I say good riddance.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-21/apple-said-to-abandon-development-of-wireless-routers-ivs0ssec
--
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
