Good riddance!!! I hate those things...

The switching to bridge thing is still a nuisance sometimes, but I it's
usually preferred anyway. The biggest problem with them is the UI, things
that should be simple, like changing a channel seems to be nearly
impossible if you aren't using a Mac, and even then it's pain to try and
talk someone through over the phone.

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:

> "(3) They would usually default to bridge mode, and saturate the local
> DHCP pool"
>
> Is this because you're not IPing your network properly? Usually this only
> happens if you're handing client RFC1918 addresses in which case bridging
> is appropriate behavior for the router.
>
> The rest I'd say are valid complaints.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Bill Prince" <[email protected]>
> *To: *[email protected]
> *Sent: *Monday, November 28, 2016 10:32:09 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] OT: Apple abandoning development of wireless
> routers
>
> The biggest issues for me was that (1) they were constantly changing the
> UI of their proprietary "airport admin" tool, (2) The Windows version was
> always a few revs behind (or would not work), (3) They would usually
> default to bridge mode, and saturate the local DHCP pool, (4) would not
> allow simple adjustments to channel frequencies, (5) their admin tool was
> proprietary, and not just a simple web server.
>
>
> There are probably another half dozen or so issues that I'm not recalling
> now.
>
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 11/28/2016 8:13 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> I know some WISP's beef with them was because the WISP wasn't properly
> IPing their network. What other concerns are there?
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Bill Prince" <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> *To: *"Motorola III" <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> *Sent: *Monday, November 28, 2016 10:07:21 AM
> *Subject: *[AFMUG] OT: Apple abandoning development of wireless routers
>
> Finally! There routers have caused more than their fair share of support
> calls. I say good riddance.
>
> https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-21/apple-said-to-abandon-
> development-of-wireless-routers-ivs0ssec
>
>
> --
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to