I know we're at the limit for what our distribution line can handle. When 
diagnosing issues, my dad asked about getting more volume and they said we're 
near the max. It would require 1-3/4 miles of new lines. Oh... Well, we got it 
to work anyway. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 11:09:26 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] generator fuel 

Don't they run high pressure on the pipe with a pressure regulator at your end? 
I'm betting it can deliver whatever volume he needs. 


-----Original Message----- 
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett 
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 10:53 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] generator fuel 

Yeah, I was just wondering whether the gas pipe will deliver the volume that 
you need to keep the genny running. 

They might not have planned on your proposed consumption when they laid the 
pipes. 


------ Original Message ------ 
From: "Robert" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: 12/2/2016 10:55:55 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] generator fuel 

>Are you getting the NG delivered by pipe? 
> 
>On 12/2/16 5:49 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: 
>>I am assuming a BTU of fuel will make so many Wh of energy. 
>> 
>>If perfectly efficient 1M BTU =292.3 kWh 
>>That would cost me *$35* from the power utility. 
>> 
>>A gallon of diesel is abou $3.25 around here. 139000 btu. 
>>Diesel then is about $23 per 1M btu. 
>>However diesel engines are only 30% efficient so it will cost me *$76* 
>>in fuel to make that 292.3 kWh 
>> 
>>If that assumption is approximately correct: 
>>I pay about $7.80 per decatherm in the winter for NG. A decatherm is 
>>1 
>>million btu 
>>About half that in summer. 
>> 
>>$7.80/.3= *$26*/293.3 kWh for NG not considering depreciation and 
>>maint 
>>of the generator. 
>> 
>>It seems to me that NG is the hands down fuel cost winner? Anyone see 
>>mistakes in this? 
>> 




Reply via email to