4096QAM might only work at super short range, but I'm sure it will be
nice when it works.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 12/9/2016 12:30:14 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
PMP. 5 GHz unlicensed. 4096QAM. 100 MHz channel. And world peace.
Seriously, how much trouble do you have getting a 40 MHz airFiber PTP
link to run at 10X? And where are you going to find 100 MHz of 5 GHz
spectrum for PMP?
The acronym LTU almost seems like a play on LTE-U, but that makes no
sense, as LTE-U talks directly to handsets.
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2016 10:49 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
New radio platform from the air fiber team. In a nutshell:
FDD or HDD
PTMP
4096QAM
Custom silicon rather than COTS chipset
2 million PPS
channel sizes up to 100mhz
The speaker makes an allusion to copying the useful features from LTE
but leaving the mobility baggage.
It's powerpointware / vaporware at the moment.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Bill Prince" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 12/9/2016 11:43:07 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
OK. I'm not familiar with the LTU thing, and I try to avoid marketing
hype from UBNT. LTE is Long Term Evolution, and is capable under ideal
circumstances of pushing ~~ 17 bits/Hz.
What pray tell is LTU?
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 12/9/2016 4:55 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
The confusion between LTE and LTU has to be intentional on UBNT's
side. If not to ride on something else's coattails, why would you use
a very similar acronym?
