This reminds me of the reversible express lanes on Lake Shore Drive in Chicago. 
 It depends on knowing that more people want to go one way in the morning and 
the other way in the evening.  Globally.  The only predictable pattern like 
that in our business might be to make the up/down ratio more asymmetric in the 
evening when the residential customers are watching video, and more symmetric 
during the day for business customers and in the middle of the night for cloud 
backup.  But it really doesn’t matter except at peak usage times (again, 
globally, not just one tower with atypical customer traffic), so you  might as 
well set your up/down ratio for 7-10 pm.

 

PTP is different, some links don’t interfere with any other links and don’t 
need sync, so they can use dynamic up/down ratio.  Cambium PTP500/600/650 has 
that mode, I’m surprised airFiber-X doesn’t.  I end up setting mine at 50% 
because they are mostly in rings and you want the traffic to be able to go 
either way around the ring in case of a failure.

 

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 5:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?

 

Syncing requires everything working together.  Dynamic allocation requires 
everything working as each AP sees is best. The two are at opposition.  Making 
them work together likely means sacrificing so much of one or maybe both of 
them as to make them almost useless. 

In no engineer and notably ignorant but that is how I see it. 

 

On Sat, Dec 10, 2016, 5:30 PM Mike Hammett <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Why?

 



-----
Mike Hammett
 <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>  
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>  
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 
 <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange
 <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>  
<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> 
 <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP
 <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>  
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> 





  _____  


From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 4:50:23 PM


Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?

Seems like fool’s gold, the concept is fundamentally flawed, not just waiting 
for someone to do it right.

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf 
Of Bill Prince
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 4:22 PM


To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?

 

I'm not throwing vinegar. Just being an honest skeptic. ;-)

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
 

On 12/10/2016 2:20 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

That's fine. It's not something I'm holding my breath on, but if someone does 
it, great.

Throwing vinegar on it won't help, though.



-----
Mike Hammett
 <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>  
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>  
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 
 <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange
 <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>  
<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> 
 <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP
 <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>  
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> 





  _____  


From: "Bill Prince"  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 4:19:00 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?

Great in theory. I'll believe it when I see it.

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
 

On 12/10/2016 2:18 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

It's system-wide. The controller is in your NOC. Perhaps one of the SDN 
technologies could manage the ratios. I'll admit that I haven't done much with 
OpenDayLight, but something like this fits into it's hype wheelhouse.



-----
Mike Hammett
 <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>  
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>  
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 
 <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange
 <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>  
<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> 
 <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP
 <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>  
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> 





  _____  


From: "Bill Prince"  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 4:13:38 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?

That's OK for maybe one POP. How do you make sure the 6 POPs around you do the 
same thing?

 

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
 

On 12/10/2016 2:09 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

Controller knows system-wide what's up and sends out updates every so often to 
change at a certain time slot. It doesn't have to be real-time. Once a minute? 
Once every five minutes? It doesn't even need to be infinitely variable. Maybe 
there's four to eight settings that it goes among? Maybe you mark some devices 
as priority so their needs weighted more greatly, but otherwise if half the 
system is hitting contention in a given direction, move up to the next ratio at 
that next time slot.



-----
Mike Hammett
 <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>  
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>  
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 
 <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange
 <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>  
<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> 
 <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP
 <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>  
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> 





  _____  


From: "Chuck McCown"  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 3:48:15 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?

I suppose if you negotiate ratio on every single transmission, you could 
come up with a terribly inefficient protocol that would be synced and 
dynamic.

-----Original Message----- 
From: Bill Prince
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 2:46 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?

Synced dynamic ratio is pure fairy dust.


bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 12/10/2016 1:36 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> attempting to have a synced dynamic ratio platform, though. Hopefully 
> someone gets this some day.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reply via email to