Twilight Sparkle is getting ready.
------ Original Message ------
From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: 12/9/2016 2:32:30 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
Lick the Tears of Unicorns
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]>
wrote:
Actually I believe it was to confuse LTE-U with LTU
LTE –U stands for Long Term Evolution – Unlicensed, what LTU stands
for?
From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Mike Hammett
<[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, December 9, 2016 at 8:55 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
The confusion between LTE and LTU has to be intentional on UBNT's
side. If not to ride on something else's coattails, why would you use
a very similar acronym?
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
Gino Villarini
PresidentMetro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 10:40:29 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
I think mixing LTE with what UBNT is doing would be a mistake. Were
you under the impression they were doing an LTE variant?
On Dec 8, 2016 10:35 AM, "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> wrote:
It is common with LTE. UBNT calls it LTU so may be they look what
others do at the RF layer.
Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Jon Langeler
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2016 16:45
An:[email protected]
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
It's not common. But you wouldn't need sync. You would need channel
spacing and such.
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
On Dec 8, 2016, at 10:36 AM, castarritt . <[email protected]>
wrote:
Why would you want to run FDD for PTMP? Wouldn't that prevent using
sync for frequency re-use?
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]>
wrote:
If the announced stuff happens (I am not sure with this as UBNT
failed to deliver all promises as does several other manufacterers
in the present and past) it will be different than 450m.
What is most interesting to me that they claim it to work TDD or
FDD. Then it will be the first affordable FDD PTMP Platform. This
is nothing 450 can do. If Ubnt will do massive mimo is
questionable. They talked „advanced mimo patterns“ but who knows.
I have learned to see and use what is buyable. Vendor promises are
„might happen“. Seen this with cambium, mikrotik, ubnt, mimosa,
mercurynets, …
Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Mike Hammett
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2016 13:04
An:[email protected]
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
LTU should be a PMP-like platform at a lower cost. It should check
lots of boxes. It won't be a 450m, though.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <[email protected]>
To: "af" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 10:46:10 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
Elevate, as far as I can tell, is designed to provide a
non-forklift migration path to ePMP. I don't see either Elevate
or ePMP playing to the same market is the AirFiber LTU or the
450-derived platforms (including Medusa).
My best guess from everything I've read and heard is that the
AirFiber LTU is going to live in the spot between the ePMP/802.11
derived radios and the 450m, both in price and performance.
Put differently: 802.11<ePMP<AirFiber LTU<450i<450m. (Or maybe
switch 450i and Airfiber LTU, or change < to =)
-forrest
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Timothy Steele
<[email protected]> wrote:
It's called Airfiber LTU the AP will have a SFP port they designed
all the Chips ground up for WISP's only
And working sync obviously from the Motorola guys the win cambium
is having with epmp elevate is going to be very short lived tables
about to turn on cambium in a big way and I think that's why they
are taking a huge risk of getting into legal trouble from UBNT
but I don't think Robert cares as he already knows he won the end
game
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016, 8:49 PM Josh Luthman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Sorta did in Vegas, but didn't really change the stock with that
news. Not that coming out with the product would really do that.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 7, 2016 5:52 PM, "Carl Peterson"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Announcement of AF PTMP??
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Josh Luthman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Ubnt is at an all time high. Last peak was March 2014. Just
over 5 years old, pretty cool to watch it go up and down.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Josh Reynolds
<[email protected]> wrote:
Lol
On Dec 7, 2016 3:19 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]>
wrote:
Are they publically traded? 4th quarter sales bookings but
not shipping?
From: That One Guy /sarcasm
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 2:17 PM
To:[email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
They had a banner 2016, they pissed in robert peras Christmas
porridge, maybe theyre pushing out that shine for 2017
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Daniel White
<[email protected]> wrote:
Very very few have shipped from Cambium. Expect to hear a
lot more this month.
Daniel White
Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales
ConVergence Technologies
Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 <tel:%28303%29%20746-3590>
[email protected]
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gino
Villarini
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 12:37 PM
To:[email protected]
Subject: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News?
So, more then a month out and no 450M operator with raving
reviews? Is this a dud?
Gino Villarini
President
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free. www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't
see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as
part of the team.
--
Carl Peterson
PORT NETWORKS
401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553
Baltimore, MD 21202
(410) 637-3707 <tel:%28410%29%20637-3707>
--
Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.
Tel: 406-449-3345 <tel:%28406%29%20449-3345> | Address: 3577
Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
[email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
<http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
