Oh and I agree with chuck's statement too. In the end you're likely going to end up giving them the list. You don't want to be a big pain in the rear and become a target for their retaliation. My main concern is that whoever actually approved the warrant approved what you can give them (customer identity vs identities)
On Dec 27, 2016 1:47 PM, "Forrest Christian (List Account)" < [email protected]> wrote: > I'd be concerned about privacy violations. > > My response would be a call to my attorney, with the intent being to push > back just enough to make sure the judge understands the response is going > to violate the privacy of hundreds of innocent john does. I can think of > several strategies but I'm not a lawyer so many of them probably aren't > worth a hill of beans. > > On Dec 27, 2016 1:18 PM, "David Sovereen" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> What would you guy do if you got a search warrant containing a shared, >> NAT IP serving hundreds of customers? >> >> We responded that the IP was shared and could not be used to pinpoint a >> specific customer. >> >> They responded that they want a list of all customers that it could be, >> no matter how many. This is the first time getting that kind of response. >> Normally, they just say okay and go away. >> >> Is the request too broad? >> >> Do I just comply and give them a list of all those customers? >> >> Dave >> >> ====================================================================== >> MERCURY NETWORK CORPORATION >> David Sovereen >> 989-837-3790 x 151 <(989)%20837-3790> >> 2719 Ashman St Ste 1, Midland, MI 48640-4434 >> http://www.mercury.net >> >> >>
