I don't have more than a weeks worth of graph data, but with 450m, we
see about 50-80% increase in throughput vs 450.
On 1/4/2017 4:01 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
That assumes you have plenty of available spectrum. But in reality
5.4 is DFS which is yucky, and 5.2 takes a xmt power hit due to OOBE
rules anywhere but the top of the sub-band.
If you have limited spectrum, I would think 450m for the win.
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy
/sarcasm
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 4, 2017 3:18 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] epmp vs 450 comparison
average 38mb at about 67% air time, puts the calculated capacity at
around 56mb, so roughly 64-67% efficiency
My thoughts are in the long run its just going to be more efficient to
stick up more EPMP and distribute the load by SM distance between EIRP
limitations of the different rulesets, the biggest cost factor being
power consumption, but it will take 3 or 4 EPMP to equal a 450m, and 4
epmp costs less than one 450m leaving money for enclosures and power
supplies assuming there is space, and this particular site has space
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Brian Sullivan
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
You say "64-7% efficient". So you're seeing traffic hit ~55M at
peak?
If so, I wouldn't expect to see much more with PMP450.
On 1/4/2017 2:55 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
if im running 75/25, epmp is roughly 87mb capacity, 450 93mb
capacity
is this correct?
are efficiencies batter on 450 if installation is the same?
ie, if I forlifted one AP with 17 epmps to 450, where would my
gains be assuming everything stays installed in the same spot.
Its not like the FCC gives 450 any more power than epmp, so
path loss should be the same.
Im looking at this epmp 1000 sector thats running overall
about 64-7% efficient with 17 subscribers and wondering what
the gain is to move to 450 (exclude medusa, as its not field
proven)
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part
of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
