With ePMP you are limited to (IIRC) 75/25 and 50/50 for the up/ down ratio. With 450 you can slice and dice the bandwidth anyway you want.
Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell [email protected] > On Jan 5, 2017, at 9:21 AM, Trey Scarborough <[email protected]> wrote: > > Your biggest difference is your throughput per MHZ your epmp will do less > bandwidth in a 20mhz channel than a 450. he other big difference is > subscriber density. It is not recommended to go over 20-30 subs per AP on > epmp without loss of performance. I regularly see 450 APs with 70+ subs per > AP. With Medusa I have seen over 130. As far as the Medusa not being field > proven you may not have field tested it yet, but I know for a fact it has > been tested and running on networks for some time now and a viable solution. > > If you have any more questions feel free to hit me up off list. > >> On 1/5/2017 7:36 AM, David Milholen wrote: >> The radios on these 2 are entirely different. One is using std based >> radio and the other completely proprietary. >> >> Since framing will be slightly different and so will processing delay. >> The stds based radio gets close to mimicking the >> >> 450 series but thats strictly based on Cambium magic. Capacity and >> sustained rates per VC is the where you will see a difference. >> >> Latency will be very consistent from ap to sub. PMP450i is where its at. >> >> >> >>> On 1/4/2017 2:55 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>> if im running 75/25, epmp is roughly 87mb capacity, 450 93mb capacity >>> is this correct? >>> >>> are efficiencies batter on 450 if installation is the same? ie, if I >>> forlifted one AP with 17 epmps to 450, where would my gains be >>> assuming everything stays installed in the same spot. Its not like the >>> FCC gives 450 any more power than epmp, so path loss should be the same. >>> Im looking at this epmp 1000 sector thats running overall about 64-7% >>> efficient with 17 subscribers and wondering what the gain is to move >>> to 450 (exclude medusa, as its not field proven) >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> -- > >
