Yup.  What Faisal said.

Basically the two co-located units transmitting on the same channel doesn't matter as long the two remote ends each hear only one of them. Usually the beamwidth is so narrow that you have lots of re-use opportunity.


------ Original Message ------
From: "Faisal Imtiaz" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 1/17/2017 12:12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11x - frequency reuse ??

..... Since one channel (dedicated) is used for TX and another one (dedicate) for RX ... with appropriate separation it is possible to make things work...

:)

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Gino Villarini" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 12:07:54 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11x - frequency reuse ??
Theres no need for gps sync reuse in fdx world …

From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Paul McCall <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11x - frequency reuse ??

OK. CAN they work with Re-Use like the 5x stuff does? (licensing aside)



From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 11:56 AM
To: af <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11x - frequency reuse ??



I don't see why not, as long as you can talk a frequency coordinator into doing it. It's not like anyone else is going to object to it.







Gino Villarini

PresidentMetro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:55 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected]> wrote:


will they approve self interfering links?



On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:

Yeah... talk to a frequency coordinator. My understanding is, that if you file an application that would only interfere with your own stuff, nobody is going to care, and it'll go through fine... obviously you would have to make sure you weren't really interfering with your other links.



On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Faisal Imtiaz <[email protected]> wrote:

This question is best to be asked to your Freq. coordinator...



Some of your assumptions are not quite the way things work.... :)



Regards.



Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected]



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Paul McCall" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 11:28:31 AM
Subject: [AFMUG] AF11x - frequency reuse ??

Just had a thought as we have a tower with 2 11ghz links on them ATM, and I would love to add a 3rd and 4th.



Wondering if the AF11x is designed for frequency reuse, and does the FCC understand that so they wouldn’t kick back the application because of “lack of available frequencies” ?



Sorry if that has already been discussed. Been buried for a couple weeks (in all ways here) and digging back out!



Paul McCall, President

PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.

658 Old Dixie Highway

Vero Beach, FL 32962

772-564-6800

[email protected]

www.pdmnet.com

www.floridabroadband.com














--

If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.



Reply via email to