The date on my dead drive is April 2011. Not too bad for a WD RE drive.

I have noticed that Windows Defender likes to constantly do background scanning. I'm sure that adds some wear on HDDs. I have a WD Black 2TB drive in my PC at home. That's a noisy SOB. I can definitely tell when Defender starts scanning.

On 2/14/2017 1:25 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
I have been seeing a high instance of windows 10 upgrades having drive failures, the upgrade has the 100 percent disk usage issue more prevalent than the straight installation. I think its just increasing the spin time on the drives faster than normal, Ive seen it on 2-6 year old drives, the six year old drives i expect to fail anyway

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:11 PM, George Skorup <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Yeah. But why would that have anything to do with it? The drive
    obviously failed.

    On 2/14/2017 12:44 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
    was this a win10 machine upgraded from 7 by chance?

    On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:13 AM, George Skorup
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        WTF, is this fail Thursday? The HDD in my office PC went tits
        up today too. Nope, no drive detected on that SATA port and
        won't spin up. OMG. Swapped the board out from another
        identical drive. Hey, it's detected now! Nope, clink, clank
        and it spins down.

        250GB WD RE4 that ran for 5 or 7 years straight. I forget
        when I built that machine. I had most of the stuff on it
        except for some scripts and config files and a few really old
        pictures that are kind of irrelevant now anyway. Oh well.


        On 2/9/2017 10:17 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
        This is for a single, stand alone machine, very low storage
        usage, just want to cover a HD failure.

        On 2/9/2017 9:42 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
        Agreed.

        Software Storage FTW. (ZFS, Ceph, GlusterFS, etc)

        On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Mike Hammett
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            Hardware RAID is indeed for suckers. ZFS or something
            like that for the win.

            Well, RAID is obsolete. You shouldn't even be running
            RAID controllers with ZFS, only HBAs. The file system
            is far more intelligent and capable than a hardware
            controller.



            -----
            Mike Hammett
            Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
            
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
            Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
            
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
            The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
            <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>


            <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
            
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            *From: *"Trey Scarborough" <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>>
            *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Sent: *Thursday, February 9, 2017 8:07:24 PM
            *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Raid Controller Recommendations

            If it is for network attached storage I would recommend
            against hardware
            raid and use btrfs or zfs. I have to many issues with
            corrupted raid
            information on drives. The advances with these file
            systems make raid
            almost obsolete.

            On 2/9/2017 10:42 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
            > Drives are cheap.  RAID 1 is obsolete.  Buy 2 more
            drives and use something like RAID 10?
            >
            > AFAIK yes Adaptec and LSI are still the main
            players.  I have one server with Adaptec RAID but the
            place I ordered it from now seems to only carry LSI,
            not sure why.  Some of those cards can throw off a lot
            of heat and adding fans to the chassis may make sense,
            especially if it's a 1U server, many servers don't have
            all the fans populated by default and adding 1-2 more
            may not cost much.
            >
            >
            > -----Original Message-----
            > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Nate Burke
            > Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 10:18 AM
            > To: Animal Farm <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
            > Subject: [AFMUG] Raid Controller Recommendations
            >
            > I'm looking for a simple hardware raid controller to setup
            2 drives in Raid 1.  The motherboard has the ICH9R
            controller which can do Raid1, but it looks like the
            monitoring software isn't compatible with Windows
            > 10 (I just bricked the box trying to install an older
            version)
            >
            > It's been a while since I've purchased raid cards.  I
            think my last one's were 3ware, which is now LSI.  Are
            Adaptec and LSI still the main players?
            >
            >
            >









-- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
    your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of
    the team.




--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to