No argument. But when the party in power controls the Justice Department, the FBI, and the CIA, and pretty much any department that can contribute to an indictment of the President, there is no way any longer to get justice for a rogue or criminal president. I don’t make these claims lightly but I point you to reading the transcripts from the many depositions the Clintons were pulled into for colluding with a foreign enemy. The Loral situation and the Commerce Secretary that was actually a Chinese Communist agent who fled the country when discovered were just the beginning. This information is publicly available and shows exactly how the Clintons colluded with China to give up not only military secrets, but to give them access to secured government economic data and influence it. These two issues are indisputable but as we have learned since then, when it takes the Justice Department to assign a special prosecutor and the Attorney General is both corrupt and a political appointee of the President who needs to be investigated, then we will never be able to get justice for a traitorous president.
Rory From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 9:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT. New low ...Trump appears to blame generals for SEAL's death in Yemen raid There's a definition of treason in the constitution. It's pretty specific. I don't want to be combative, but I want political discourse to based on fact and reason no matter whose side it's from. If Hillary Clinton was well documented as a traitor, she would not have been nominated by a major political party to run for president. Period. Conspiracy theories =/= documentation. ------ Original Message ------ From: "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: 2/28/2017 9:29:06 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT. New low ...Trump appears to blame generals for SEAL's death in Yemen raid I should have said Democrats who are the current supporters of Obama. I can start with the Clintons in the 90’s with Loral and Johnny Chung. Their trail of being traitors to the U.S. is long and well documented. In more recent times, Benghazi, side deals with Iran, multiple side deals with Russia, Podesta, Hillary, etc… Move on to the email server and then from there, keep following the money with Hillary and Bill. The recent leaks of some of Trumps conversations definitely fall under the category of treason. Rory From: Af [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 6:14 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT. New low ...Trump appears to blame generals for SEAL's death in Yemen raid That's a heck of an accusation. Do you have an example of Obama supporters committing treason? ------ Original Message ------ From: "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: 2/28/2017 7:39:07 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT. New low ...Trump appears to blame generals for SEAL's death in Yemen raid Trump had nothing to do with this mission but considering that Obama supporters are not above treason to make their political goals, that’s where I’d be starting. Rory From: Af [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Bill Prince Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 5:35 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT. New low ...Trump appears to blame generals for SEAL's death in Yemen raid Might be simpler than that. Could just be a few idiots in the new admin that don't know how to keep their traps shut. His Orangeness doesn't seem to connect the dots very well himself. He thought the conversations that Flynn was having with the Russians were a good thing. On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 4:25 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Who benefits from the leak? 1. ISIS 2. Enemies of Trump/GOP/USA ISIS probably did not leak to themselves. So what does that leave us with? Apply Occam's razor. From: That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 4:47 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT. New low ...Trump appears to blame generals for SEAL's death in Yemen raid Exactly, thats why the dad didnt need to request an investigation, it is being investigated He should have not addressed that during the softball interview and waited til tonights address with a prepared speech but this is going to have a shit ton of fallout On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The person to blame is the one that leaked details of the action to the bad guys. They walked into a setup. This was long planned under Obama. How do you not know that Obama did not leak it to make Trump look bad? Or Hillary? Somebody in the know leaked it. He blamed our military. He is the Commander. Therefore he is blaming himself irrespective of his words. The guy certainly has no grace or class when it comes to things like this. He needs a bit of “the buck stops here” but he is just the opposite. From: Jaime Solorza Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 4:29 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: [AFMUG] OT. New low ...Trump appears to blame generals for SEAL's death in Yemen raid https://news.google.com/news/ amp?caurl=http%3A%2F% 2Fthehill.com%2Fpolicy% 2Fdefense%2F321614-trump- appears-to-place-blame-on- generals-for-seal-killed-in- yemen-raid%3Famp#pt0-72526<https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fpolicy%2Fdefense%2F321614-trump-appears-to-place-blame-on-generals-for-seal-killed-in-yemen-raid%3Famp#pt0-72526> -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
