At most they check to see if something is scrawled on the signature line.
-----Original Message-----
From: Keefe John
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 8:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speaking of banks and banking
I dont think banks check signatures period.
On 3/18/2017 6:38 AM, Paul Stewart wrote:
It became such and issue for me with another company i was involved with
that we ended up using a service that (conveniently or ironically) the
bank offers to protect against this kind of stuff. The name varies bank
to bank but basically when you do check runs, you upload that information
to the bank and only those checks will be honoured and within a certain
timeframe. it was quite expensive but having to deal with fraud issues
all the time is too …
On Mar 17, 2017, at 11:31 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
Also, I found out if you have a double signature requirement on checks
and someone sends one through with only one signature, the bank does not
give a crap.
-----Original Message----- From: Rory Conaway
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 2:26 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speaking of banks and banking
I believe you have about 60 days maximum to file claims. After that you
are basically screwed with the way the laws are written. I tell you this
from experience.
Rory
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 1:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speaking of banks and banking
Yeah, the one guy that signed his own name to one of the checks signed it
with a decent enough signature that the graphologists can match it up to
many other examples of his signature that are available in public
records.
-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 2:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speaking of banks and banking
Yeah, I'm guessing if they wrote checks to themselves then you know
exactly who to make a claim against. I'm sure Chuck has weighed the
options though.
Surely that's some kind of crime with a statute of limitations of more
than
60 days.
~Seth
