yeah, we sell Lenovo primarily, It may help, the russians with kaspersky will try to stop the chinese from lenovo from stealing our client data.
Malwarebytes has always amazed me in its ability to find and mitigate all kinds of threats, Ive looked at them as a solution as well. Seriously considered using strictly malwarebytes, but its got some technical curve as a real time client in things it asks the users about On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote: > Security Essentials couldn’t catch a butterfly with a tent sized net and > at this point is a joke. Magazines don’t even both testing it any longer > against real products. When it couldn’t’ catch 50% of the viruses when > everyone else was above 70% to 100%, they gave up. Kapersky can’t be used > like Lenovo for anything governmental because the entire Eastern Block has > access to it. Symantec, although one of the best, is constantly being > penetrated by porn sites (we have many field testers as clients). The best > combination so far that we have found is Symantec supplemented by > Malwarebytes full version. At the head end, Barracuda Web Gateway devices > have Malwarebytes signatures among other things. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *CBB - Jay Fuller > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 8:24 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky > > > > > > I have deployed a symantec endpoint solution. client dropped it a few > years ago cause it got too bloated. moved to microsoft security essentials > based on suggestions from this list. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* Steve Jones <[email protected]> > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 9:55 AM > > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky > > > > We are a symantec endpoint shop for our contract customers, but they do > not offer a mobile client package. > > Kaspersky does. Ive always liked their products, seem effective, slightly > less cumbersome to a system than the SEP. The only downside is full > protection tends to cause a 20-30 percent decrease in network throughput in > its default scan state, I assume that can be remedied with some > configuration changes. > > > > My largest concern is its a Russian cyber-security entity, this does make > me somewhat cautious. Ive never read any negative about their > "trustability" in regard to their home region. If anything else, I would > suspect they have greater access to source code for generating definition > libraries. > > > > Anyone here ever deployed any of their SMB/Corporate solution? > >
