I've had a lot of luck with e-set. It's not heavy and bloated and the
price doesn't kill you.
On 4/11/2017 12:08 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
yeah, we sell Lenovo primarily, It may help, the russians with
kaspersky will try to stop the chinese from lenovo from stealing our
client data.
Malwarebytes has always amazed me in its ability to find and mitigate
all kinds of threats, Ive looked at them as a solution as well.
Seriously considered using strictly malwarebytes, but its got some
technical curve as a real time client in things it asks the users about
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Security Essentials couldn’t catch a butterfly with a tent sized
net and at this point is a joke. Magazines don’t even both
testing it any longer against real products. When it couldn’t’
catch 50% of the viruses when everyone else was above 70% to 100%,
they gave up. Kapersky can’t be used like Lenovo for anything
governmental because the entire Eastern Block has access to it.
Symantec, although one of the best, is constantly being penetrated
by porn sites (we have many field testers as clients). The best
combination so far that we have found is Symantec supplemented by
Malwarebytes full version. At the head end, Barracuda Web Gateway
devices have Malwarebytes signatures among other things.
Rory
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *CBB - Jay Fuller
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2017 8:24 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky
I have deployed a symantec endpoint solution. client dropped it a
few years ago cause it got too bloated. moved to microsoft
security essentials based on suggestions from this list.
----- Original Message -----
*From:*Steve Jones <mailto:[email protected]>
*To:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:*Tuesday, April 11, 2017 9:55 AM
*Subject:*[AFMUG] Thoughts on Kaspersky
We are a symantec endpoint shop for our contract customers,
but they do not offer a mobile client package.
Kaspersky does. Ive always liked their products, seem
effective, slightly less cumbersome to a system than the SEP.
The only downside is full protection tends to cause a 20-30
percent decrease in network throughput in its default scan
state, I assume that can be remedied with some configuration
changes.
My largest concern is its a Russian cyber-security entity,
this does make me somewhat cautious. Ive never read any
negative about their "trustability" in regard to their home
region. If anything else, I would suspect they have greater
access to source code for generating definition libraries.
Anyone here ever deployed any of their SMB/Corporate solution?
