The DFS bug was in relation to 40 MHz channels where it would see false positives. It does appear to be fixed in 3.3.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, it's very much more better in 3.3. All of the XM radios we have left > have been pretty stable since upgrading to 3.3... but it's possible that's > partially because a lot of the problem radios got replaced before 3.3 was > released and only the good ones are left. I guess I'll find out when I > Elevate the next tower. > > Unfortunately most of our ubnt 5ghz stuff is XM because of the whole thing > with the XW radios being limited to the 5.8ghz band until after we had > already switched most of our 5ghz to ePMP... > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I heard a lot of bad stuff about Elevate and XM radios. Is that more >> better now? >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >> >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> >> *To: *"af" <[email protected]> >> *Sent: *Tuesday, April 18, 2017 4:20:23 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ePMP v3.3 >> >> I've been slowly upgrading everything to 3.3, mostly because of the SNMP >> lockup thing in 3.2.2... and everything using Elevate is on 3.3, because >> they had some major fixes for UBNT XM radios, but I don't know that we have >> an ePMP stuff using DFS... if we do, it's off somewhere in a distant corner >> of the network that I haven't touched in months. >> >> If I remember right, there were some major DFS issues starting with 3.0, >> and I think it was mostly fixed by 3.2.... but since it didn't affect me >> much, I haven't paid too close of attention. >> >> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Josh Luthman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Anyone else miss the Mikrotik days where every single change was >>> instant? =( >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:52 PM, George Skorup <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Yeah, I don't have much on 3.3 yet. One of the annoyances I've >>>> experienced so far is that ANY config change, something even as simple as >>>> enabling syslog web view, will cause a system-wide config reload which >>>> results in DFS having to go through CAC all over again, obviously on an AP >>>> running in DFS land anyway. This didn't happen with 3.2.2. I'm sure this >>>> had to be done probably for a number of reasons, but I'm positive that one >>>> of them was that I informed Cambium a few months ago that an old bug came >>>> back. It was possible (on 3.2.2) to make the GUI available on the NAT WAN >>>> interface even with the separate wireless management interface enabled >>>> after saving network config changes. The only fix was to reboot the SM. Now >>>> I take it that they're completely resetting drivers, interfaces and daemons >>>> upon save w/ 3.3. >>>> >>>> Anyway.. I haven't loaded 3.3 on any deployed gear running in DFS bands >>>> yet, mostly just bench stuff, so I can't say if more DFS issues have been >>>> positively resolved. I believe there were some notes about radar stuffs in >>>> 3.3 betas/RCs though. >>>> >>>> On 4/18/2017 11:44 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>>> >>>> I thought that had been fixed awhile back... but I can't even remember >>>> what the problem was, so I could be wrong. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Josh Luthman < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hasn't been any mention of it. I don't use it myself. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <%28937%29%20552-2340> >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <%28937%29%20552-2343> >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Dan Petermann <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Did they get the DFS figured out yet? >>>>>> >>>>>> It seems to me there was a problem using the DFS bands, but I can’t >>>>>> seem to find what it was. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >
