I dont like that in 3.x the interface has become a slug again On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:24 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote:
> The DFS bug was in relation to 40 MHz channels where it would see false > positives. It does appear > to be fixed in 3.3. > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Yes, it's very much more better in 3.3. All of the XM radios we have left >> have been pretty stable since upgrading to 3.3... but it's possible that's >> partially because a lot of the problem radios got replaced before 3.3 was >> released and only the good ones are left. I guess I'll find out when I >> Elevate the next tower. >> >> Unfortunately most of our ubnt 5ghz stuff is XM because of the whole >> thing with the XW radios being limited to the 5.8ghz band until after we >> had already switched most of our 5ghz to ePMP... >> >> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I heard a lot of bad stuff about Elevate and XM radios. Is that more >>> better now? >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>> >>> >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *"af" <[email protected]> >>> *Sent: *Tuesday, April 18, 2017 4:20:23 PM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ePMP v3.3 >>> >>> I've been slowly upgrading everything to 3.3, mostly because of the SNMP >>> lockup thing in 3.2.2... and everything using Elevate is on 3.3, because >>> they had some major fixes for UBNT XM radios, but I don't know that we have >>> an ePMP stuff using DFS... if we do, it's off somewhere in a distant corner >>> of the network that I haven't touched in months. >>> >>> If I remember right, there were some major DFS issues starting with 3.0, >>> and I think it was mostly fixed by 3.2.... but since it didn't affect me >>> much, I haven't paid too close of attention. >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Josh Luthman < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Anyone else miss the Mikrotik days where every single change was >>>> instant? =( >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:52 PM, George Skorup < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yeah, I don't have much on 3.3 yet. One of the annoyances I've >>>>> experienced so far is that ANY config change, something even as simple as >>>>> enabling syslog web view, will cause a system-wide config reload which >>>>> results in DFS having to go through CAC all over again, obviously on an AP >>>>> running in DFS land anyway. This didn't happen with 3.2.2. I'm sure this >>>>> had to be done probably for a number of reasons, but I'm positive that one >>>>> of them was that I informed Cambium a few months ago that an old bug came >>>>> back. It was possible (on 3.2.2) to make the GUI available on the NAT WAN >>>>> interface even with the separate wireless management interface enabled >>>>> after saving network config changes. The only fix was to reboot the SM. >>>>> Now >>>>> I take it that they're completely resetting drivers, interfaces and >>>>> daemons >>>>> upon save w/ 3.3. >>>>> >>>>> Anyway.. I haven't loaded 3.3 on any deployed gear running in DFS >>>>> bands yet, mostly just bench stuff, so I can't say if more DFS issues have >>>>> been positively resolved. I believe there were some notes about radar >>>>> stuffs in 3.3 betas/RCs though. >>>>> >>>>> On 4/18/2017 11:44 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I thought that had been fixed awhile back... but I can't even remember >>>>> what the problem was, so I could be wrong. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Josh Luthman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hasn't been any mention of it. I don't use it myself. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <%28937%29%20552-2340> >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <%28937%29%20552-2343> >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Dan Petermann <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Did they get the DFS figured out yet? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It seems to me there was a problem using the DFS bands, but I can’t >>>>>>> seem to find what it was. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
